...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Should pancreatectomy with islet cell autotransplantation in patients with chronic alcoholic pancreatitis be abandoned?
【24h】

Should pancreatectomy with islet cell autotransplantation in patients with chronic alcoholic pancreatitis be abandoned?

机译:慢性酒精性胰腺炎患者应放弃胰岛细胞自体胰切除术?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Pancreatectomy or drainage has been advocated for pain due to chronic pancreatitis. Islet cell autotransplantation (IAT) may improve quality of life (QOL); optimal patient selection has not been established. Study Design: Outcomes of 100 patients who underwent pancreatectomy with islet isolation between 2005 and 2012 were assessed by etiology (alcoholic pancreatitis [AP] 30%, and nonalcoholic pancreatitis [NAP] 70%). Insulin requirement, Short Form-36, and McGill Pain Questionnaires were assessed. Data were analyzed using SASv9.2. Results: Of the 100 patients, isolation was unsuccessful in 9 patients due to fibrosis. Alcoholic pancreatitis was associated with 7 of 9 failed isolations (23% vs 3%, p < 0.01), and all of these patients are now diabetic. Ninety-one patients (age 44 years, follow-up 19 months, 23% AP) underwent resection with IAT. Total islet yield (islet cell equivalents [IEQ]) and IEQ/kg body weight were less for patients with AP (81,000 vs 150,000, p < 0.01; 1,260 vs 2,190, respectively, p = 0.01) overall and more specifically, for total pancreatectomy (92,000 vs 188,000, respectively, p = 0.02). Twenty-eight (34%) of all patients who had resections and 15% of those undergoing total pancreatectomy are insulin free. Multivariate analysis identified AP as an independent predictor of insulin units/day (p = 0.01). Complete pre- and postoperative QOL and pain surveys were available on 69 patients. Patients with AP had less QOL improvement (1 of 8 vs 5 of 8 domains, p < 0.01) and "present pain" improvement at 2 years from preoperative levels in those with NAP; no improvement in QOL was seen in those with AP (NAP 2.7 to 1.2, p < 0.01; AP 2.7 to 2.2, p > 0.05). Conclusions: After pancreatic resection with planned IAT, AP resulted in failed isolations, lower yields, higher insulin requirements, poor long-term QOL improvement, and no improvement in pain scores compared with NAP. Further studies should define criteria for resection and IAT for patients with alcoholic chronic pancreatitis.
机译:背景:提倡胰腺切除术或引流治疗慢性胰腺炎引起的疼痛。胰岛细胞自体移植(IAT)可以改善生活质量(QOL);尚未确定最佳患者选择。研究设计:通过病因学评估酒精性胰腺炎[AP]为30%,非酒精性胰腺炎[NAP]为70%)在2005年至2012年间接受胰岛分离手术的100例患者的结局。评估了胰岛素需求量,36号简表和麦吉尔疼痛问卷。使用SASv9.2分析数据。结果:在100例患者中,有9例由于纤维化而未能分离。酒精性胰腺炎与9例失败的隔离病例中的7例相关(23%比3%,p <0.01),并且所有这些患者现在都患有糖尿病。接受IAT切除的91例患者(年龄44岁,随访19个月,AP占23%)。总的来说,总的来说胰岛切除术的总胰岛产量(胰岛细胞当量[IEQ])和IEQ / kg体重更低(分别为81,000 vs 150,000,p <0.01; 1,260 vs 2,190,p = 0.01) (分别为92,000和188,000,p = 0.02)。在所有切除手术的患者中,有二十八(34%)名接受胰切除术的患者中有15%没有胰岛素。多变量分析确定AP是胰岛素单位/天的独立预测因子(p = 0.01)。对69名患者进行了完整的术前和术后QOL和疼痛调查。与NAP相比,AP患者在术前2年的QOL改善程度较小(8个域中的1个对8个域中的5个,p <0.01),并且在2年时“当前疼痛”得到改善。 AP患者的QOL没有改善(NAP 2.7至1.2,p <0.01; AP 2.7至2.2,p> 0.05)。结论:计划进行IAT的胰腺切除术后,AP导致分离失败,产量降低,胰岛素需求增加,长期QOL改善较差,并且疼痛评分没有改善(与NAP相比)。进一步的研究应确定酒精性慢性胰腺炎患者的切除和IAT标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号