...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research: JSLHR >Inference generation during text comprehension by adults with right hemisphere brain damage: activation failure versus multiple activation.
【24h】

Inference generation during text comprehension by adults with right hemisphere brain damage: activation failure versus multiple activation.

机译:患有右半球脑损伤的成年人在文本理解过程中的推理产生:激活失败与多次激活。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evidence conflicts as to whether adults with right hemisphere brain damage (RHD) generate inferences during text comprehension. M. Beeman (1993) reported that adults with RHD fail to activate the lexical-semantic bases of routine bridging inferences, which are necessary for comprehension. But other evidence indicates that adults with RHD activate multiple interpretations in various comprehension domains. In addition, the activation of contextually inappropriate interpretations is prolonged for many adults with RHD and predicts poor discourse comprehension. This study contrasted Beeman's activation failure hypothesis with the prediction that adults with RHD would generate multiple interpretations in text comprehension. The relation between activation of textually incompatible inferences and discourse comprehension was also investigated for this group. Thirty-seven adults with RHD and 34 without brain damage listened to brief narratives that required a bridging inference (BI) to integrate the text-final sentence. This final sentence, when isolated from its text, was strongly biased toward a contextually incompatible alternate interpretation (AI). Auditory phoneme strings were presented for lexical decision immediately after each text's initial and final sentence. Adults with RHD were both faster and more accurate in making lexical decisions to BI-related target words in final-sentence position than in initial-sentence position. Thus, contrary to the activation failure hypothesis, adults with RHD generated the lexical-semantic foundations of BIs where they were required by the text. AI generation was evident in accuracy data as well, but not in response time data. This result is partially consistent with the multiple activation view. Finally, greater activation for contextually incompatible interpretations was associated with poorer discourse comprehension performance by adults with RHD.
机译:关于患有右半球脑损伤(RHD)的成年人在文本理解过程中是否产生推论的证据存在矛盾。 M. Beeman(1993)报告说,患有RHD的成年人无法激活日常桥接推理的词汇语义基础,而这对于理解是必不可少的。但是其他证据表明,患有RHD的成年人会在各种理解领域激活多种解释。此外,对于许多患有RHD的成年人来说,情境不恰当的解释的激活时间延长了,并且预言了不良的话语理解能力。这项研究将Beeman的激活失败假设与成人RHD的预测在文本理解中会产生多种解释进行了对比。该小组还研究了文本不相容的推论的激活与话语理解之间的关系。三十七名RHD成年人和34名无脑损伤的成年人听了简短的叙述,这些叙述需要桥接推理(BI)来整合文本定句。当最后一句话与其文本隔离时,强烈偏向于上下文不兼容的替代解释(AI)。在每个文本的开头和结尾句子之后,立即提供听觉音素串以进行词汇判断。与初始句子位置相比,具有RHD的成年人在与最终句子位置相关的BI相关目标词的词法决策上更快,更准确。因此,与激活失败假设相反,成人RHD在文本要求的地方生成了BI的词汇语义基础。 AI生成在准确性数据中也很明显,但在响应时间数据中却不明显。此结果与多次激活视图部分一致。最后,对于上下文不相容的解释,更多的激活与成人RHD的较差的话语理解能力有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号