首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP >Out-of-School-Time Academic Programs to Improve School Achievement: A Community Guide Health Equity Systematic Review
【24h】

Out-of-School-Time Academic Programs to Improve School Achievement: A Community Guide Health Equity Systematic Review

机译:校外学术课程,以提高学校成绩:社区指南健康公平系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: Low-income and minority status in the United States are associated with poor educational outcomes, which, in turn, reduce the long-term health benefits of education. Objective: This systematic review assessed the extent to which out-of-school-time academic (OSTA) programs for at-risk students, most of whom are from low-income and racial/ethnic minority families, can improve academic achievement. Because most OSTA programs serve low-income and ethnic/racial minority students, programs may improve health equity. Design: Methods of the Guide to Community Preventive Services were used. An existing systematic review assessing the effects of OSTA programs on academic outcomes (Lauer et al 2006; search period 1985-2003) was supplemented with a Community Guide update (search period 2003-2011). Main Outcome Measure: Standardized mean difference. Results: Thirty-two studies from the existing review and 25 studies from the update were combined and stratified by program focus (ie, reading-focused, math-focused, general academic programs, and programs with minimal academic focus). Focused programs were more effective than general or minimal academic programs. Reading-focused programs were effective only for students in grades K-3. There was insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness on behavioral outcomes and longer-term academic outcomes. Conclusions: OSTA programs, particularly focused programs, are effective in increasing academic achievement for at-risk students. Ongoing school and social environments that support learning and development may be essential to ensure the longer-term benefits of OSTA programs.
机译:背景:在美国,低收入和少数民族地位与不良的教育成果有关,这反过来又降低了教育的长期健康益处。目的:这项系统的评估评估了针对高危学生的校外学术(OSTA)计划在多大程度上可以提高学业成绩,这些计划来自低收入和种族/少数民族家庭。因为大多数OSTA计划都为低收入和少数族裔/少数民族学生提供服务,所以这些计划可能会改善健康公平性。设计:使用了《社区预防服务指南》中的方法。现有的评估OSTA计划对学术成果影响的系统评价(Lauer等,2006;搜索期1985-2003)补充了《社区指南》更新(搜索期2003-2011)。主要指标:标准化均值差。结果:现有评论中的32项研究和更新中的25项研究通过课程重点(即,以阅读为重点,以数学为重点,一般学术课程和学术关注度最低的课程)进行了合并和分层。重点课程比一般或基础学术课程更为有效。以阅读为重点的课程仅对K-3年级的学生有效。没有足够的证据来确定行为成果和长期学术成果的有效性。结论:OSTA课程,特别是重点课程,对于提高高危学生的学业成绩是有效的。持续的支持学习和发展的学校和社会环境对于确保OSTA计划的长期利益可能至关重要。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号