...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychiatric research >Commentary on Abortion Studies of Steinberg and Finer (Social Science & Medicine 2011; 72:72-82) and Coleman (Journal of Psychiatric Research 2009;43:770-6 & Journal of Psychiatric Research 2011;45:1133-4)
【24h】

Commentary on Abortion Studies of Steinberg and Finer (Social Science & Medicine 2011; 72:72-82) and Coleman (Journal of Psychiatric Research 2009;43:770-6 & Journal of Psychiatric Research 2011;45:1133-4)

机译:Steinberg和Finer(社会科学与医学2011; 72:72-82)和Coleman(《精神病学杂志》 2009; 43:770-6和《精神病学杂志》 2011; 45:1133-4)的堕胎研究评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A letter from Steinberg and Finer and a response by Coleman are published in this issue regarding an earlier article published in this journal by Coleman et al. (2009), a replication subsequently published by Steinberg and Finer (2011), and a corrigendum written by Coleman et al. (2011) This exchange highlights key issues in a debate regarding the potential psychiatric effects of induced abortions. As the debate involved competing secondary analyses of the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS), the Editor (AFS) asked Ron Kessler, the Principal Investigator of the NCS, to assist in ferreting out the issues here. Based on our joint review and discussion of the debate, we conclude that the Steinberg-Finer critique has considerable merit and that the Coleman et al. (2009) analysis does not support their assertions that abortions led to psychopa-thology in the NCS data. The rationale for this conclusion is presented below.
机译:Steinberg和Finer的来信以及Coleman的回应在本期中发表,内容涉及Coleman等人在本杂志上发表的一篇较早的文章。 (2009年),随后由Steinberg和Finer(2011年)发表,并由Coleman等人撰写的勘误。 (2011)这种交流突出了有关人工流产的潜在精神病学影响的辩论中的关键问题。由于辩论涉及对国家合并症调查(NCS)进行的竞争性二级分析,因此编辑(AFS)要求NCS首席研究员Ron Kessler协助在此提出问题。根据我们对辩论的共同审查和讨论,我们得出的结论是,斯坦伯格·芬纳的批评具有可观的优点,而科尔曼等人则对此进行了评论。 (2009年)的分析不支持他们的断言,即在NCS数据中堕胎导致了精神病学。该结论的基本原理如下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号