...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics >Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting to assess plasma clearance of inert renal markers.
【24h】

Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting to assess plasma clearance of inert renal markers.

机译:Tikhonov自适应正则化伽玛变量拟合,以评估惰性肾脏标志物的血浆清除率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Tk-GV model fits Gamma Variates (GV) to data by Tikhonov regularization (Tk) with shrinkage constant, lambda, chosen to minimize the relative error in plasma clearance, CL (ml/min). Using (169)Yb-DTPA and (99m)Tc-DTPA (n = 46, 8-9 samples, 5-240 min) bolus-dilution curves, results were obtained for fit methods: (1) Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) one and two exponential term (E and E), (2) OLS-GV and (3) Tk-GV. Four tests examined the fit results for: (1) physicality of ranges of model parameters, (2) effects on parameter values when different data subsets are fit, (3) characterization of residuals, and (4) extrapolative error and agreement with published correction factors. Test 1 showed physical Tk-GV results, where OLS-GV fits sometimes-produced nonphysical CL. Test 2 showed the Tk-GV model produced good results with 4 or more samples drawn between 10 and 240 min. Test 3 showed that E and E failed goodness-of-fit testing whereas GV fits for t > 20 min were acceptably good. Test 4 showed CL(Tk-GV) clearance values agreed with published CL corrections with the general result that CL(E1) > CL(E2) > CL(Tk-GV) and finally that CL(Tk-GV) were considerably more robust, precise and accurate than CL(E2), and should replace the use of CL(E2) for these renal markers.
机译:Tk-GV模型通过Tikhonov正则化(Tk)将Gamma Variates(GV)拟合到数据,其收缩常数为lambda,其选择是要最小化血浆清除率CL(ml / min)的相对误差。使用(169)Yb-DTPA和(99m)Tc-DTPA(n = 46,8-9个样品,5-240分钟)推注-稀释曲线,获得了拟合方法的结果:(1)普通最小二乘法(OLS)一和两个指数项(E和E),(2)OLS-GV和(3)Tk-GV。四个测试检查了以下结果的拟合结果:(1)模型参数范围的物理性;(2)拟合不同数据子集时对参数值的影响;(3)残差的特征;(4)外推误差和与公布的校正一致因素。测试1显示了物理Tk-GV结果,其中OLS-GV适合有时产生的非物理CL。测试2显示Tk-GV模型在10到240分钟之间抽取了4个或更多个样本,产生了良好的结果。测试3显示E和E未能通过拟合优度测试,而t> 20 min的GV拟合良好。测试4显示CL(Tk-GV)间隙值与已发布的CL修正值一致,其总体结果是CL(E1)> CL(E2)> CL(Tk-GV),最后CL(Tk-GV)更加健壮比CL(E2)更精确,更准确,并且应取代将CL(E2)用于这些肾标志物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号