首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting to assess plasma clearance of inert renal markers
【2h】

Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting to assess plasma clearance of inert renal markers

机译:Tikhonov自适应正则化伽玛变量拟合以评估惰性肾脏标志物的血浆清除率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Tk-GV model fits Gamma Variates (GV) to data by Tikhonov regularization (Tk) with shrinkage constant, λ, chosen to minimize the relative error in plasma clearance, CL (ml/min). Using 169Yb-DTPA and 99mTc-DTPA (n = 46, 8–9 samples, 5–240 min) bolus-dilution curves, results were obtained for fit methods: (1) Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) one and two exponential term (E1 and E2), (2) OLS-GV and (3) Tk-GV. Four tests examined the fit results for: (1) physicality of ranges of model parameters, (2) effects on parameter values when different data subsets are fit, (3) characterization of residuals, and (4) extrapolative error and agreement with published correction factors. Test 1 showed physical Tk-GV results, where OLS-GV fits sometimes-produced nonphysical CL. Test 2 showed the Tk-GV model produced good results with 4 or more samples drawn between 10 and 240 min. Test 3 showed that E1 and E2 failed goodness-of-fit testing whereas GV fits for t > 20 min were acceptably good. Test 4 showed CLTk-GV clearance values agreed with published CL corrections with the general result that CLE1 > CLE2 > CLTk-GV and finally that CLTk-GV were considerably more robust, precise and accurate than CLE2, and should replace the use of CLE2 for these renal markers.
机译:Tk-GV模型通过收缩常数λ的Tikhonov正则化(Tk)将伽玛变量(GV)拟合到数据,该收缩常数选择为最小化血浆清除率CL(ml / min)的相对误差。使用 169 Yb-DTPA和 99m Tc-DTPA(n = 46,8–9个样品,5–240分钟)推注-稀释曲线,获得了拟合方法的结果:(1)普通最小二乘(OLS)一和二个指数项(E1和E2),(2)OLS-GV和(3)Tk-GV。四个测试检查了以下结果的拟合结果:(1)模型参数范围的物理性;(2)拟合不同数据子集时对参数值的影响;(3)残差的特征;(4)外推误差和与公布的校正一致因素。测试1显示了物理Tk-GV结果,其中OLS-GV适合有时产生的非物理CL。测试2显示Tk-GV模型在10到240分钟之间抽取了4个或更多样本产生了良好的结果。测试3显示E1和E2在拟合度测试中失败,而GV在20分钟内的拟合度是可以接受的。测试4显示CLTk-GV间隙值与已发布的CL修正值一致,总体结果为CLE1> CLE2> CLTk-GV,最后, CL Tk-GV比更坚固,准确和准确> CL E 2,并应代替 CL E 2用于这些肾标志物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号