...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >An Integrative Lens Model Approach to Bias and Accuracy in Human Inferences: Hindsight Effects and Knowledge Updating in Personality Judgments
【24h】

An Integrative Lens Model Approach to Bias and Accuracy in Human Inferences: Hindsight Effects and Knowledge Updating in Personality Judgments

机译:人为推理中的偏见和准确性的综合镜头模型方法:人格判断中的后见效应和知识更新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present article integrates research on the accurate inference of personality traits with process models of hindsight bias (the tendency to exaggerate in hindsight what one had said in foresight). Specifically, the article suggests a new model that integrates assumptions of the lens model on accurate personality judgments and accounts that view hindsight effects as a by-product of knowledge updating. We suggest 3 processes that have the potential to explain the occurrence of hindsight effects in personality judgments: (a) changes in an individual's cue perceptions, (b) changes in the utilization of more valid cues, and (c) changes in the consistency with which cue knowledge is applied. In 2 studies (N1 = 91, N2 = 93), participants were presented with target pictures and were asked to judge each target's levels of the Big Five. Thereafter, they received feedback and had to recall their original judgments. Results show that there were clear hindsight effects for all 5 personality dimensions. Importantly, we found evidence that both the utilization of more valid cues and changes in cue perceptions-but not changes in the consistency with which cue knowledge is applied-account for the hindsight effects. Implications of these results for models explaining hindsight effects, the inference of personality judgments, and the accuracy of these inferences are discussed.
机译:本文将对人格特质的准确推断的研究与事后偏见的过程模型(事后看来夸大了人的先见之明的趋势)相结合。具体而言,本文提出了一个新模型,该模型整合了关于准确人格判断的镜头模型假设,并说明了将后见之明视为知识更新的副产品。我们建议通过3个过程来解释人格判断中事后影响的发生:(a)个人提示感知的变化,(b)使用更有效提示的变化,以及(c)与应用了哪些提示知识。在2项研究(N1 = 91,N2 = 93)中,向参与者展示了目标图片,并要求他们判断每个目标的五巨头水平。此后,他们收到了反馈,不得不回想起最初的判断。结果表明,所有五个人格维度都有明显的事后影响。重要的是,我们发现有证据表明,利用更有效的提示和提示感知的变化,但应用提示知识的一致性的变化都没有,这是后见之明的原因。讨论了这些结果对模型的影响,这些模型解释了事后看来的影响,人格判断的推论以及这些推论的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号