首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Comparison of laparoscopic myomectomy using in situ morcellation with and without uterine artery ligation for treatment of symptomatic myomas.
【24h】

Comparison of laparoscopic myomectomy using in situ morcellation with and without uterine artery ligation for treatment of symptomatic myomas.

机译:腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术使用原位粉碎术和不行子宫动脉结扎术治疗有症状肌瘤的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation (LUAL) before in situ morcellation (ISM) compared with ISM alone.Prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).University-affiliated hospital.One hundred forty-four women with symptomatic uterine myomas, of whom 45 underwent LUAL and ISM and 99 underwent ISM only, from August 2007 through August 2009.Ligation or no ligation of the uterine arteries before ISM.In the LUAL+ISM group compared with the ISM group, mean (SD) operative time was significantly longer (107 [34] minutes vs 93 [35] minutes; p = .03), and there was less intraoperative blood loss (84 [53] mL vs 137 [166] mL; p < .001). Eight patients in the ISM group (8.1%) required a blood transfusion, including 4 (4.0%) with excessive intraoperative bleeding and 4 (4.0%) with postoperative hematomas. Although myomas in the LUAL+ISM group weighed more (p < .001), none of the patients in that group had excessive intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hematomas, or required blood transfusion (p = .046). At 2 years of follow-up, in the LUAL+ISM group compared with the ISM group, the myoma recurrence rate was 7% vs 24%, and symptom improvement was reported by 98% of patients vs 86% (statistically significant).Laparoscopic myomectomy using an ISM technique with or without simultaneous LUAL may be used in the management of symptomatic uterine myomas; however, LUAL+ISM may result in a better surgical outcome.
机译:与单独使用ISM相比,评估腹腔镜子宫原位结扎术(ISM)之前的腹腔镜子宫结扎(LUAL)的疗效。前瞻性研究(加拿大工作组分类II-1)。大学附属医院.144例有症状子宫的妇女从2007年8月至2009年8月,其中45例接受了LUAL和ISM的肌瘤,仅99例进行了ISM。在ISM之前,子宫动脉结扎或未结扎。在LUAL + ISM组与ISM组相比,平均(SD)手术时间明显更长(107 [34]分钟vs. 93 [35]分钟; p = .03),术中失血更少(84 [53] mL vs 137 [166] mL; p <.001)。 ISM组中有8例患者(8.1%)需要输血,其中4例(4.0%)术中出血过多,4例(4.0%)术后血肿。尽管LUAL + ISM组的肌瘤重得多(p <.001),但该组中没有患者发生术中出血过多,术后血肿或需要输血(p = .046)。随访2年,与ISM组相比,LUAL + ISM组的肌瘤复发率分别为7%和24%,据报道有98%的患者出现症状改善,而有86%的患者报告有统计学意义(统计学意义)。使用ISM技术进行子宫肌瘤切除术,同时或不同时进行LUAL可以用于症状性子宫肌瘤的治疗。但是,LUAL + ISM可能会带来更好的手术效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号