...
首页> 外文期刊>BioScience >Policymakers' and Scientists' Ranks of Research Priorities for Resource-Management Policy
【24h】

Policymakers' and Scientists' Ranks of Research Priorities for Resource-Management Policy

机译:政策制定者和科学家对资源管理政策的研究优先级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent collaboration between decisionmakers and scientists in the United States yielded 40 research questions that reflected the needs of those with jurisdiction over natural resources. We surveyed managers, policymakers and their advisers, and scientists to rank the questions with respect to their applicability to policy. The 602 respondents included 194 policymakers, 70 government scientists, and 228 academic scientists. A question on the water supply necessary to sustain human populations and ecosystem resilience was ranked as having the greatest potential, if it were answered, to increase the effectiveness of policies related to natural resource management in the United States. Research priorities differed significantly among the respondents. However, no simple science-policy divide was evident. Priorities did not differ between academics and government employees or between scientists (academic and government) and policymakers. Our results suggest that participatory exercises can establish priorities to guide funders of research and researchers who aim to inform policy.
机译:美国决策者和科学家之间最近的合作产生了40个研究问题,反映了对自然资源有管辖权的人们的需求。我们对经理,政策制定者及其顾问和科学家进行了调查,以就问题对政策的适用性进行排序。 602位受访者包括194位决策者,70位政府科学家和228位学术科学家。如果回答了有关维持人口和生态系统复原力所必需的水的问题,则该问题在提高美国与自然资源管理有关的政策的有效性方面具有最大的潜力。受访者之间的研究重点明显不同。但是,没有简单的科学政策鸿沟明显。学者和政府雇员之间或科学家(学术界和政府)与政策制定者之间的优先级没有差异。我们的结果表明,参与式练习可以确定优先次序,以指导旨在为政策提供信息的研究和研究人员的出资者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号