首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bioscience >Ocean Research Priorities: Similarities and Differences among Scientists Policymakers and Fishermen in the United States
【2h】

Ocean Research Priorities: Similarities and Differences among Scientists Policymakers and Fishermen in the United States

机译:海洋研究重点:美国科学家政策制定者和渔民之间的异同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Understanding and solving complex ocean conservation problems requires cooperation not just among scientific disciplines but also across sectors. A recently published survey that probed research priorities of marine scientists, when provided to ocean stakeholders, revealed some agreement on priorities but also illuminated key differences. Ocean acidification, cumulative impacts, bycatch effects, and restoration effectiveness were in the top 10 priorities for scientists and stakeholder groups. Significant priority differences were that scientists favored research questions about ocean acidification and marine protected areas; policymakers prioritized questions about habitat restoration, bycatch, and precaution; and fisheries sector resource users called for the inclusion of local ecological knowledge in policymaking. These results quantitatively demonstrate how different stakeholder groups approach ocean issues and highlight the need to incorporate other types of knowledge in the codesign of solutions-oriented research, which may facilitate cross-sectoral collaboration.
机译:了解和解决复杂的海洋保护问题不仅需要科学学科之间的合作,而且还需要跨部门的合作。最近发布的一项调查对海洋科学家的研究重点进行了调查,将其提供给海洋利益相关者后,揭示了一些有关重点的观点,但也阐明了关键差异。海洋酸化,累积影响,兼捕影响和恢复有效性是科学家和利益相关者团体的十大优先事项。优先事项之间存在重大差异,即科学家偏爱有关海洋酸化和海洋保护区的研究问题;政策制定者优先考虑有关栖息地恢复,兼捕和预防的问题;渔业部门的资源使用者呼吁在决策中纳入当地的生态知识。这些结果定量地说明了不同的利益相关者团体如何处理海洋问题,并强调了将其他类型的知识纳入面向解决方案的研究的符号中的必要性,这可能会促进跨部门合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号