...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology: an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing >The impact of atrial prevention and termination therapies on atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in patients receiving a dual-chamber defibrillator for ventricular arrhythmias.
【24h】

The impact of atrial prevention and termination therapies on atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in patients receiving a dual-chamber defibrillator for ventricular arrhythmias.

机译:房室预防和终止疗法对接受双室除颤器治疗室性心律不齐的患者的房室快速性心律失常负担的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: This prospective, multicenter, randomized trial evaluated the effects of atrial prevention and termination therapies on atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) burden in patients with a standard indication for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). METHODS: A Jewel AF or GEM III AT ICD was implanted in 451 patients. At 1-month post-implant, patients were randomized to atrial prevention and termination therapies ON ( n = 199) or OFF ( n = 206) and followed for 6 additional months. Automatic atrial shocks were enabled in only 14% of the ON group. The follow-up time after randomization was 6.9 +/- 2.4 months ON versus 6.8 +/- 2.3 months OFF. RESULTS: There were 126/405 (31.1%) patients who had AT/AF episodes during follow-up. Only four patients received a shock to treat ATA's during follow-up. The median ATA burden was 0 hours/month in both the ON and OFF groups ( P = 0.40). The mean ATA burden was 4.3 +/- 20.0 hours/month ON versus 9.0 +/- 50.0 hours/month OFF ( P = 0.11). In a subgroup of 192 patients with a history of ATA's, the median burden was 0 hours/month in the both groups ( P = 0.23). However, the mean burden in this subgroup was 7.6 +/- 27.1 hours/month ON versus 19.2 +/- 73.7 hours/month OFF ( P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving an ICD for ventricular arrhythmias, no significant change in ATA burden was observed when atrial prevention and termination therapies were enabled. This may have been due to the low ATA burden in this population. In a subgroup of patients with history of ATA's, there was a trend towards a reduction in mean burden.
机译:简介:这项前瞻性,多中心,随机试验评估了心房预防和终止疗法对可植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的标准适应症患者房速性心律失常(ATA)负担的影响。方法:451名患者植入了Jewel AF或GEM III AT ICD。植入后1个月,将患者随机分为开房(n = 199)或关房(n = 206)的心房预防和终止治疗,并再随访6个月。仅ON组的14%启用了自动心房休克。随机分组后的随访时间为6.9 +/- 2.4个月,而6.8 +/- 2.3个月。结果:随访期间有AT / AF发作的患者为126/405例(31.1%)。在随访期间,只有四名患者接受了电击治疗ATA。在开和关组中,ATA负担的中位数均为0小时/月(P = 0.40)。平均ATA负担为4.3 +/- 20.0小时/月(开),而9.0 +/- 50.0小时/月(开)(P = 0.11)。在192名有ATA病史的患者亚组中,两组的平均负担为0小时/月(P = 0.23)。但是,该亚组的平均负担为每月7.6 +/- 27.1小时/月,相对于19.2 +/- 73.7小时/月(P = 0.056)。结论:在接受ICD治疗室性心律失常的患者中,启用房颤预防和终止疗法后,未观察到ATA负荷的显着变化。这可能是由于该人群中较低的ATA负担。在有ATA病史的患者亚组中,有减少平均负担的趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号