...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of information ethics >Authors' Moral Rights-And How Editors and Publishers Routinely Abridge Them
【24h】

Authors' Moral Rights-And How Editors and Publishers Routinely Abridge Them

机译:作者的精神权利-以及编辑和出版商如何例行删节他们

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I take it as my ethical starting point that no one speaks for anyone else, except with agency. This is especially true, if anything at all can properly be termed "especially true," for professional authors who customarily-if not always; even Homer nods- say what and only what they.mean to say. Yet editors and publishers-who should surely know better-routinely abridge this ethical principle by a variety of maneuvers which have the same, contrarian effect: That the author ultimately ends up conveying something other than what and only what he intended to convey. Most of the time the differences are small; sometimes they are egregious.
机译:我将自己的道德出发点作为我的道德出发点,除了与代理机构外,没有人为别人说话。对于那些习惯于(如果不是总是)习惯的专业作者,如果可以将任何东西恰当地称为“特别是真的”,则尤其如此。甚至荷马点头-说什么,只说什么。但是,编辑和出版商-他们当然应该更好地了解-通过各种具有相反相反效果的操作来例行地删节这一道德原则:作者最终最终传达的不是他想要传达的内容,而是他要传达的内容。大多数时候,差异很小。有时他们太厉害了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号