...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition >Activation of Lexical and Semantic Representations Without Intention Along GPC-Sublexical and Orthographic-Lexical Reading Pathways in a Stroop Paradigm
【24h】

Activation of Lexical and Semantic Representations Without Intention Along GPC-Sublexical and Orthographic-Lexical Reading Pathways in a Stroop Paradigm

机译:在Stroop范式中无意沿GPC-亚词法和正字法-词法阅读途径激活词法和语义表示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dual route models of reading suggest there are 2 pathways for reading words: an orthographic-lexical pathway, used to read familiar regular words and exception words, and a grapheme-to-phonemeconversion-(GPC)-sublexical pathway, used to read unfamiliar regular words, pseudohomophones (PHs), and nonwords. It is unclear, however, whether PHs activate lexical and semantic representations without intention in the GPC-sublexical pathway to the same extent as words along the orthographic-lexical pathway. The present study explored this by introducing a novel condition, color pseudohomophone associates (CPHAs; e.g., "skigh"), in 3 experiments using the Stroop paradigm. Experiment 1 examined 4 types of stimuli: color words (CWs), color word associates (CWAs), color PHs (GPHs), and color PH associates (CPHAs), in a mixed list context. Significant Stroop effects were found for all 4 types of stimuli. To ensure the robustness of this effect, Experiment 2 was conducted using pure list contexts whereby participants received only word stimuli (e.g., CWs, CWás) or only PH stimuli (e.g., CPHs, CPHAs). The results replicated those of Experiment 1, suggesting that CPHAs activate lexical and semantic representations without intention in the GPC-sublexical pathway. Experiment 3 added 2 novel conditions: color exception wоrd associates (which can only be pronounced correctly using the orthographic-lexical pathway) to compare the effects obtained with color exception PH associates (which rely on the GPC-sublexical pathway for correct pronunciation). Stroop effects of similar magnitude were found for both types of stimuli, suggesting lexical and semantic representations are accessed without intention in either reading pathway to a similar degree. Implications for models of reading are discussed.
机译:双重阅读路径模型表明,有两种阅读单词的途径:用于阅读熟悉的常规单词和异常单词的正字法途径,以及用于阅读陌生的常规词素到音素转换(GPC)的亚词汇途径单词,伪谐音(PH)和非单词。但是,尚不清楚PH是否在GPC次词法路径中无意激活词汇和语义表示,其程度与正字词法词路径中的单词相同。本研究通过使用Stroop范式在3个实验中引入了一种新的条件,即彩色伪谐音伴奏(CPHAs;例如“ skigh”),从而对此进行了探索。实验1在混合列表上下文中检查了4种类型的刺激:颜色词(CW),颜色词关联(CWA),颜色PH(GPH)和颜色PH关联(CPHA)。发现所有4种刺激物均具有明显的Stroop效应。为了确保这种效果的鲁棒性,实验2是使用纯列表上下文进行的,参与者仅接收单词刺激(例如CW,CWás)或仅接受PH刺激(例如CPH,CPHA)。该结果重复了实验1的结果,表明CPHAs激活了词汇和语义表示,而无意参与GPC-次词汇途径。实验3添加了2种新颖的条件:颜色异常世界同伴(只能使用正字-词法途径才能正确发声),以比较使用颜色异常PH同伴(依靠GPC-词法途径获得正确发音)获得的效果。对于两种类型的刺激都发现了类似幅度的Stroop效应,这表明在任何一种阅读途径中,词汇和语义表示都无意访问到相似的程度。讨论对阅读模型的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号