首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Safety of the Factory Preset Rotation Angle of Reciprocating Instruments
【24h】

Safety of the Factory Preset Rotation Angle of Reciprocating Instruments

机译:往复式仪器出厂预设旋转角度的安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the torsional resistance of 2 reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments (Reciproc [VDW, Munich, Germany] and WaveOne [Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland]) operated at the maximum rotating angle in a proprietary motor. Methods: With the file tip secured at various levels (3, 4, or 5 mm) of Reciproc R25 and WaveOne Primary, the distortion angles and torsional loads were monitored during counterclockwise movement at 2 rpm until fracture (n = 10 at each level) for a load-distortion graph. The rotation angles and loads at the beginning point of the plateau, the ultimate torsional strength, final fracture angle, and toughness were determined. The data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey post,hoc test at alpha = .05. The lateral longitudinal aspect and the fracture cross-section of each specimen were examined by scanning electron microscopy after the test. Results: The rotation angle at the beginning point of the plateau was significantly greater for a binding site farther away from the tip of the instrument for both systems (P < .05), and all were greater than 170 degrees (preset in the dedicated motor from manufacturer). The ultimate strength and toughness also increased significantly at levels farther away from the instrument tip (P < .05). All specimens showed typical topographic features of torsional fracture, including the circular abrasion marks and fibrous dimples near the rotation center after the test. Conclusions: It was determined that the 2 brands of reciprocating files are safe when operated at the rotational angle in the proprietary motor.
机译:简介:本研究旨在研究在专用电机中以最大旋转角度运行的两种往复式镍钛仪器(Reciproc [VDW,慕尼黑,德国]和WaveOne [Dentsply Maillefer,瑞士Ballaigues,瑞士)的抗扭强度。方法:将锉刀尖端固定在Reciproc R25和WaveOne Primary的不同高度(3、4或5毫米)上,在2 rpm的逆时针运动期间监测变形角度和扭转载荷,直到破裂(每个水平n = 10)用于负载失真图。确定了高原起点的旋转角度和载荷,极限抗扭强度,最终断裂角和韧性。数据使用方差的1向分析和Tukey post,hoc检验(α= 0.05)进行分析。试验后,通过扫描电子显微镜检查每个样品的横向纵向尺寸和断裂截面。结果:对于两个系统,远离器械末端的结合位点,高原起点的旋转角度都明显更大(P <.05),并且都大于170度(在专用电机中预设)由制造商提供)。最终强度和韧性在距仪器尖端较远的位置也显着增加(P <.05)。所有标本均显示出典型的扭转断裂形貌,包括圆形磨蚀痕迹和试验后旋转中心附近的纤维凹痕。结论:确定在专有电机中以旋转角度运行时,这两个品牌的往复锉刀是安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号