首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair: Graft complexity does not predict outcome
【24h】

Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair: Graft complexity does not predict outcome

机译:有条件的血管内动脉瘤修复:移植物的复杂性不能预测结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of endografts designed with renal fenestrations alone vs. more complex designs that accommodate mesenteric arteries in a consecutive series of patients with pararenal aortic aneurysms undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: A retrospective review of data prospectively collected over a 5-year period identified 42 consecutive patients (39 men; mean age 70±7 years) who had undergone fenestrated repair of 3 type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA), 6 suprarenal aneurysms requiring at least 1 renal artery reimplantation, and 33 juxtarenal aneurysms with an infrarenal aortic neck <5 mm long. Operative variables and patient outcomes for complex fenestrated EVAR cases (n=17) using endografts involving the renal, superior mesenteric, and/or celiac arteries were compared with fenestrated stent-grafts incorporating the renal arteries alone (n=25). Major morbidity/mortality included death, myocardial infarction (MI), renal failure requiring dialysis, paraplegia, and bowel ischemia. Results: Of the 95 intended target vessels, 93 (98%) were successfully cannulated and stented (mean 2.2 covered stents per patient). The 30-day mortality was 7% (n=3), the paraplegia rate was 2% (n=1), and MI rate was 5% (n=2). One patient required dialysis for 3 months. Two bridging stent-grafts occluded: one immediately and another at 8 months. Complex fenestrated EVARs were associated with higher risk of major morbidity and mortality (4, 24%) compared to endografts involving the renal arteries alone (2, 8%), but this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.20). Operation time (mean 205±50 vs. 174±48 minutes, p=0.07), follow-up duration (mean 8.1±11 vs. 13±17 months, p=0.29), and reintervention rates (18% vs. 24%, p=0.72), respectively, were not significantly different between groups. Conclusion: In carefully selected patients with pararenal aneurysms, the inclusion of mesenteric arteries in the fenestrated graft design did not influence outcomes compared to fenestrated EVARs involving the renal arteries alone.
机译:目的:在连续一系列接受血管内动脉瘤修补术(EVAR)的肾旁主动脉瘤患者中,评估仅采用肾脏开窗术与适应肠系膜动脉的更复杂设计的内膜移植物的效果。方法:回顾性分析5年内前瞻性收集的数据,确定42例连续的患者(39名男性,平均年龄70±7岁)接受了3种IV型胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)的开窗修补术,其中6例需要行肾上动脉瘤至少进行1次肾动脉再植入,并进行33次近肾动脉瘤,主动脉下颈<5 mm。将使用肾,肠系膜上和/或腹腔动脉的内膜移植术与开窗的单纯肾动脉移植术(n = 25)进行比较,比较复杂的开窗EVAR病例(n = 17)的手术变量和患者预后。主要发病率/死亡率包括死亡,心肌梗塞(MI),需要透析的肾衰竭,截瘫和肠缺血。结果:在95个预期的目标血管中,有93个(98%)成功插管并置入支架(每位患者平均2.2个被覆支架)。 30天死亡率为7%(n = 3),截瘫率为2%(n = 1),MI率为5%(n = 2)。一名患者需要透析3个月。阻塞了两个桥接支架移植物:一个立即移植,另一个在8个月移植。与仅累及肾动脉的内移植物相比(2,8%),复杂的开窗的EVAR与主要发病率和死亡率的较高风险(4,24%)相关联,但未达到统计学意义(p = 0.20)。手术时间(平均205±50 vs. 174±48分钟,p = 0.07),随访时间(平均8.1±11 vs. 13±17个月,p = 0.29)和再干预率(18%vs. 24%) ,p = 0.72),两组之间无显着差异。结论:在精心挑选的肾旁动脉瘤患者中,与仅累及肾动脉的开窗式EVAR相比,在开窗式移植物设计中包括肠系膜动脉不会影响结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号