首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer assisted tomography >Computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography: analysis and review of the literature.
【24h】

Computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography: analysis and review of the literature.

机译:计算机断层摄影术中肺结节的计算机辅助检测:分析和文献回顾。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate diagnostic sensitivity of the pulmonary nodules computer-aided detection (CAD) in computed tomography. To analyze parameters that modify CAD performance. We made a critical analysis of the literature, and we described CAD sensitivity. Moreover, we compared CAD and CAD plus radiologist sensitivity in detection of pulmonary nodules, and we compared different acquisition techniques (thin slice vs thick slice and low dose vs normal dose). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used as major data sources the medical literature database of PubMed and MEDLINE, where we searched for articles in English language published from January 2001 to November 2006. We included studies that used spiral or multidetector row CT for CAD. RESULTS: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria containing a total of more than 827 patients and 2717 pulmonary nodules detected by CAD. We observed an overall sensitivity of 79% for the CAD and of 92% for CAD plus radiologist; CAD sensitivity was 80% and 74% for thin slice and thick slice protocols, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results of our study suggest that CAD technique is an accurate tool in detection of pulmonary nodules, by working as useful second look for the physician. Sensitivity becomes higher by using it together with radiologist. Actually, the main limitation about the use of CAD to be solved is represented by the persistent high false-positive rate.
机译:目的:评估计算机断层扫描中肺结节计算机辅助检测(CAD)的诊断敏感性。分析修改CAD性能的参数。我们对文献进行了批判性分析,并描述了CAD敏感性。此外,我们比较了CAD和CAD加上放射科医生在检测肺结节中的敏感性,并比较了不同的采集技术(薄切片vs厚切片以及低剂量vs正常剂量)。材料与方法:我们使用PubMed和MEDLINE的医学文献数据库作为主要数据源,在该数据库中检索了2001年1月至2006年11月以英语发表的文章。我们纳入了使用螺旋或多探测器行CT进行CAD的研究。结果:二十项研究符合纳入标准,通过CAD检测总共包含827例以上患者和2717例肺结节。我们观察到CAD的总体敏感性为79%,而CAD加放射线医师的总体敏感性为92%。薄片和厚片方案的CAD敏感性分别为80%和74%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,CAD技术可作为对医生有用的第二眼光,是检测肺结节的准确工具。与放射科医生一起使用,灵敏度会更高。实际上,关于使用要解决的CAD的主要局限性是持续高的假阳性率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号