...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical anesthesia >Cost analysis of xenon anesthesia: a comparison with nitrous oxide-isoflurane and nitrous oxide-sevoflurane anesthesia.
【24h】

Cost analysis of xenon anesthesia: a comparison with nitrous oxide-isoflurane and nitrous oxide-sevoflurane anesthesia.

机译:氙气麻醉的成本分析:与一氧化二氮-异氟醚和一氧化二氮-七氟醚麻醉的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost of xenon (Xe) anesthesia in relation to the anesthetic duration by conducting a cost analysis of this relatively expensive inhaled anesthetic. DESIGN: Cost analysis based on the literature on Xe anesthesia. SETTING: Anesthetic simulation based on data obtained in the operating rooms at a university hospital. PATIENTS: A 40-year-old, ASA physical status I adult patient model weighing 70 kg, undergoing elective minor surgery with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia was given in the following four techniques: 1) closed-circuit technique with Xe; 2) closed-circuit technique with nitrous oxide (N2O)-isoflurane; 3) semi-closed technique with N2O-isoflurane; and 4) semi-closed technique with N2O-sevoflurane. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cost of each anesthetic technique was compared in U.S. dollars. The cost of Xe anesthesia was consistently higher than that of N2O-isoflurane or N2O-sevoflurane (for 240-min anesthesia;
机译:研究目的:通过对这种相对昂贵的吸入麻醉药进行成本分析,确定相对于麻醉时间的氙气麻醉费用。设计:基于Xe麻醉文献的成本分析。地点:基于在大学医院手术室中获得的数据进行的麻醉模拟。患者:一位40岁,体重70公斤的ASA身体状态为I的成年成人患者,接受了行气管插管和机械通气的择期小手术。干预:麻醉采用以下四种技术:1)Xe闭路技术; 2)采用一氧化二氮(N2O)-异氟醚的闭路技术; 3)N2O-异氟醚半封闭技术; 4)N2O-七氟醚的半封闭技术。测量和主要结果:每种麻醉技术的成本以美元进行了比较。 Xe麻醉的费用始终高于N2O-异氟烷或N2O-七氟烷(240分钟麻醉;

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号