...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chemical Education >Quantitative Comparison of Three Standardization Methods Using a One-Way ANOVA for Multiple Mean Comparisons
【24h】

Quantitative Comparison of Three Standardization Methods Using a One-Way ANOVA for Multiple Mean Comparisons

机译:使用单向方差分析进行多重均值比较的三种标准化方法的定量比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of an external standard calibration curve (1–3), standard addition (4, 5), and internal standard (6, 7) methods for quantitatively determining the concentration of analytes is important to the study of analytical chemistry,especially in the area of instrumental analysis. However, as important as these three methods are, few analytical or instrumental laboratory programs have the time for students to gain adequate laboratory experience with each of the three methods. The following laboratory experiment allows for students to gain experience with all three quantitative methods in a single laboratory period using the gas chromatograph (GC), and moves their exposure to these methods from traditionally scripted laboratory exercises to a more inquiry-based, comparative-learning experience (8).
机译:使用外部标准校准曲线(1-3),标准添加(4、5)和内部标准(6、7)方法定量测定分析物的浓度对分析化学的研究非常重要,特别是在分析化学方面。仪器分析领域。但是,尽管这三种方法非常重要,但很少有分析或仪器实验室计划让学生有时间利用这三种方法获得足够的实验室经验。以下实验室实验可让学生在单个实验室期间使用气相色谱仪(GC)来获得所有三种定量方法的经验,并将他们对这些方法的了解从传统的脚本化实验室练习转移到基于查询的比较学习经验(8)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号