...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology >Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: Results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai
【24h】

Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: Results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai

机译:晚期结直肠癌患者基于伊立替康的UGT1A1 * 28基因型和SN-38药代动力学分析:来自上海多中心回顾性研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The UGT1A1*28 polymorphism, although closely linked with CPT-11-related adverse effects, cannot be used alone to guide individualized treatment decisions. However, CPT-11 dosage can be adjusted according to measured SN-38 pharmacokinetics. Our study is designed to investigate whether there is a relationship between SN-38 peak or valley concentrations and efficacy or adverse effects of CPT-11-based chemotherapy. We retrospectively studied 98 patients treated with advanced colorectal cancer in various UGT1A1*28 genotype groups (mainly (TA)6/(TA)6 and (TA) 6/(TA)7 genotypes) treated with CPT-11 as first-line chemotherapy in Shanghai. Methods: One hundred and sixty-four advanced colorectal cancer patients were enrolled. To understand differences in genotype expression, the frequency of UGT1A1*28 thymine-adenine (TA) repeats in TATA box arrangement was assessed by PCR with genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood. For ninety-eight cases with the (TA)6/(TA) 6 and (TA)6/(TA)7 genotypes treated with CPT-11 as first-line chemotherapy, the plasma concentration of SN-38 was detected by HPLC 1.5 and 49 h after CPT-11 infusion. Efficacy and adverse effects were observed subsequently, and the relationship between SN-38 plasma concentration and efficacy or adverse effects within genotype groups, as well as differences in efficacy and adverse effects between (TA)6/(TA)6 and (TA)6/(TA)7 genotypes were analyzed statistically. Results: One hundred and fourteen patients (69.51 %) were identified with the (TA)6/(TA)6 genotype, forty-eight patients (29.27 %) with the (TA)6/(TA)7 genotype, and two patients (1.22 %) with the (TA)7/(TA)7 genotype. The average peak and valley concentrations of SN-38 after CPT-11 infusion and plasma bilirubin average levels before and after CPT-11 treatment in the (TA)6/(TA) 7 genotype group were all higher than those in (TA) 6/(TA)6 group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.00). Stepwise regression analysis showed that SN-38 peak and valley concentration was correlated with PFS in the (TA)6/(TA) 6 genotype. In the (TA)6/(TA)7 group, SN-38 peak concentration was correlated with CPT-11 starting dose and OS, valley concentration correlated with plasma bilirubin levels before CPT-11 treatment, delayed diarrhea, and OS. For the (TA)6/(TA)6 genotype, mPFS of the SN-38 peak concentration 43.2 ng/ml subgroup was significantly longer than that of ≤43.2 ng/ml subgroup (8.0 ± 0.35 vs. 6.5 ± 0.79 months, χ 2 = 17.18, p = 0.00) with a relatively high incidence of Grade I/II myelosuppression; for the (TA)6/(TA) 7 genotype, there was no significant difference in mOS between the SN-38 valley concentration 16.83 ng/ml and ≤16.83 subgroups (17.3 ± 0.45 vs. 18.8 ± 0.50 months, χ 2 = 1.38, p = 0.24), but the former had a higher incidence of Grade III/IV mucositis and delayed diarrhea. For 2 (TA)7/(TA)7 cases, although 25 % dose reduction of CPT-11, which is calculated according to body surface area, Grade IV bone marrow suppression and Grade III delayed diarrhea still occurred after CPT-11 treatment, though both adverse effects resolved and did not recur again after a 50 % dose reduction. Conclusion: The (TA)6/(TA) 6 genotype and (TA)6/(TA)7 genotype accounted for the most, and (TA)7/(TA)7 genotype only account for a very small portion of advanced colorectal cancer patients in Shanghai. For the (TA)6/(TA)6 genotype, CPT-11 dosage can be increased gradually to improve efficacy for patients with SN-38 peak concentration ≤43.2 ng/ml after CPT-11 infusion; and for (TA)6/(TA)7 genotype patients, CPT-11 dosage may be lowered appropriately to reduce serious adverse effects such as bone marrow suppression and delayed diarrhea without affecting the efficacy for those with SN-38 valley concentration 16.83 ng/ml. For (TA)7/(TA)7 genotype patients, adverse effects should be closely observed after treatment even if CPT-11 dosage has been reduced.
机译:背景:UGT1A1 * 28多态性虽然与CPT-11-相关的不良反应密切相关,但不能单独用于指导个体化治疗决策。但是,可以根据测得的SN-38药代动力学调整CPT-11的剂量。我们的研究旨在调查SN-38峰值或谷值浓度与基于CPT-11-的化疗的疗效或不良反应之间是否存在关系。我们回顾性研究了使用CPT-11作为一线化疗的各种UGT1A1 * 28基因型组(主要是(TA)6 /(TA)6和(TA)6 /(TA)7基因型)的98例晚期大肠癌患者。在上海。方法:纳入164例晚期大肠癌患者。为了了解基因型表达的差异,通过PCR从外周血中提取基因组DNA,评估了TATA盒排列中UGT1A1 * 28胸腺嘧啶-腺嘌呤(TA)重复的频率。对于以CPT-11作为一线化疗的(TA)6 /(TA)6和(TA)6 /(TA)7基因型的98例患者,通过HPLC 1.5检测SN-38的血浆浓度CPT-11输注后49小时。随后观察疗效和不良反应,并观察SN-38血浆浓度与基因型组内功效或不良反应之间的关系,以及(TA)6 /(TA)6和(TA)6之间功效和不良反应的差异对/(TA)7基因型进行统计学分析。结果:鉴定出(TA)6 /(TA)6基因型的患者为114例(69.51%),(TA)6 /(TA)7基因型的患者为48例(29.27%)。 (TA)7 /(TA)7基因型为(1.22%)。 (TA)6 /(TA)7基因型组在CPT-11输注后SN-38的平均峰值和谷值浓度以及CPT-11治疗前后的血浆胆红素平均水平均高于(TA)6 /(TA)6组,差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.00)。逐步回归分析表明,在(TA)6 /(TA)6基因型中,SN-38峰谷浓度与PFS相关。在(TA)6 /(TA)7组中,SN-38峰值浓度与CPT-11起始剂量和OS相关,谷底浓度与CPT-11治疗之前的血浆胆红素水平,延迟性腹泻和OS相关。对于(TA)6 /(TA)6基因型,SN-38峰值浓度> 43.2 ng / ml亚组的mPFS明显长于≤43.2ng / ml亚组的mPFS(8.0±0.35 vs. 6.5±0.79个月, χ2 = 17.18,p = 0.00),I / II级骨髓抑制发生率相对较高;对于(TA)6 /(TA)7基因型,SN-38谷浓度> 16.83 ng / ml和≤16.83的亚组之间的mOS差异无统计学意义(17.3±0.45 vs. 18.8±0.50个月,χ2 = 1.38,p = 0.24),但前者的III / IV级粘膜炎发生率更高,腹泻延迟。对于2(TA)7 /(TA)7病例,尽管CPT-11治疗后依体表面积计算降低了25%的CPT-11剂量,但仍发生IV级骨髓抑制和III级延迟性腹泻,尽管两种不良反应均已解决,但在减少50%的剂量后并未再次出现。结论:(TA)6 /(TA)6基因型和(TA)6 /(TA)7基因型占最多,而(TA)7 /(TA)7基因型仅占晚期大肠癌的一小部分。上海的癌症患者。对于(TA)6 /(TA)6基因型,可以逐渐增加CPT-11剂量,以提高CPT-11输注后SN-38峰值浓度≤43.2ng / ml的患者的疗效;对于(TA)6 /(TA)7基因型患者,可以适当降低CPT-11剂量以减轻严重的不良反应,例如骨髓抑制和延迟腹泻,而不会影响SN-38谷浓度> 16.83 ng的患者的疗效/毫升。对于(TA)7 /(TA)7基因型患者,即使已降低CPT-11剂量,也应密切观察治疗后的不良反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号