首页> 外文期刊>Journal of burn care & research: official publication of the American Burn Association >Nonpharmacological interventions for acute wound care distress in pediatric patients with burn injury: a systematic review.
【24h】

Nonpharmacological interventions for acute wound care distress in pediatric patients with burn injury: a systematic review.

机译:小儿烧伤患者急性伤口护理困扰的非药物干预:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Acute wound care distress among burn-injured pediatric patients is of major clinical concern. This systematic review evaluates the benefits of nonpharmacological interventions to reduce this distress. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched using appropriate search terms for articles reporting overall psychological effects of pediatric burn injury. Key references were hand-searched. Searches yielded approximately 900 unique citations. Two authors reviewed each abstract, and 198 articles were retrieved, of which 34 were selected for full review. Of these 34 articles, 12 focused on acute wound care distress and nonpharmacological interventions. Critical appraisal of individual studies was conducted using the methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force, with a particular focus on assessing nonrandomized controlled trial designs. Twelve articles were reviewed and categorized according to intervention types child mediated (CM), parent mediated (PM), andhealth care provider mediated (HCPM). Using the US Preventive Services Task Force criteria, 7 of the 12 articles were rated "fair" or "good" and five were rated as having "poor" internal validity. The HCPM and CM intervention categories reported patient benefit. The two PM studies were both rated "poor." Studies of nonpharmacological interventions to reduce pediatric burn distress were few, with a significant proportion (5/12) having concerns about internal validity. Patient benefit was reported for HCPM and CM interventions. Research designs incorporating control groups in studies that are adequately powered are needed. Additional research is required in the area of PM interventions in particular.
机译:烧伤小儿患者的急性伤口护理困扰是主要的临床关注。该系统评价评估了非药物干预措施减轻这种困扰的益处。使用适当的搜索词搜索MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,PsycINFO,ERIC和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以检索报道儿科烧伤总体心理影响的文章。关键参考文献进行了手工搜索。搜索产生了大约900个独特的引用。每个摘要由两位作者审阅,并检索了198篇文章,其中34篇被选中进行全面审阅。在这34篇文章中,有12篇针对急性伤口护理困扰和非药物干预。使用美国预防服务工作队的方法对各个研究进行了严格的评估,尤其着重于评估非随机对照试验设计。根据儿童干预(CM),父母干预(PM)和医疗保健提供者干预(HCPM)的干预类型,对12篇文章进行了回顾和分类。根据美国预防服务工作队的标准,12篇文章中有7篇被评为“一般”或“好”,五篇被评为内部“差”。 HCPM和CM干预类别报告了患者受益。两项PM研究均被评为“较差”。减少小儿烧伤困扰的非药物干预研究很少,有相当一部分(5/12)关注内部有效性。据报告,HCPM和CM干预可为患者带来益处。需要将具有对照组的研究设计纳入具有足够能力的研究中。特别是在PM干预领域,还需要进行其他研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号