首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging and physical activity >Validity of an Accelerometer-Based Activity Monitor System for Measuring Physical Activity in Frail Older Adults
【24h】

Validity of an Accelerometer-Based Activity Monitor System for Measuring Physical Activity in Frail Older Adults

机译:基于加速度计的活动监测系统在体弱的老年人中进行身体活动测量的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study aimed to investigate the validity of the accelerometer-based DynaPort system to detect physical activity in frail, older subjects. Eighteen home-dwelling subjects (Groningen Frailty Indicator [GFI] score >= 4, >= 75 years) were included. Activities in their home environment were simultaneously observed by two researchers and measured with the DynaPort system during six consecutive hours. Primary outcome measures were the sensitivity and specificity of the DynaPort for locomotion (90% considered as sufficient agreement). Other outcome measures were overall agreement, and sensitivity and specificity for other activities. Sensitivity and specificity for locomotion were 83.3% and 100.0%, respectively. Overall agreement was 74.6%. Sensitivity was sufficient for sitting (94.4%), but not for lying and standing (59.2% and 69.6%, respectively). Specificity was sufficient for lying and standing (100.0% and 93.3%, respectively), but not for sitting (80.7%). In conclusion, the DynaPort system is not a valid method for assessing physical activity in frail, older subjects.
机译:这项研究旨在调查基于加速度计的DynaPort系统在检测较弱的老年受试者中的身体活动的有效性。包括十八个家庭受试者(Groningen脆弱指标[GFI]得分> = 4,> = 75岁)。两名研究人员同时观察了其家庭环境中的活动,并在连续六个小时内使用DynaPort系统对其进行了测量。主要的结局指标是DynaPort对运动的敏感性和特异性(90%被认为是足够的一致性)。其他成果衡量指标是总体共识,以及对其他活动的敏感性和特异性。运动的敏感性和特异性分别为83.3%和100.0%。总体协议率为74.6%。坐姿(94.4%)足够敏感,但躺卧和站立时的灵敏度不足(分别为59.2%和69.6%)。躺卧和站立的特异性足够(分别为100.0%和93.3%),而坐姿则没有(80.7%)。总之,DynaPort系统不是评估衰弱,年龄较大的受试者身体活动的有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号