首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes >Impact of Time of Presentation on Process Performance and Outcomes in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the American Heart Association: Mission Lifeline Program.
【24h】

Impact of Time of Presentation on Process Performance and Outcomes in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the American Heart Association: Mission Lifeline Program.

机译:演讲时间对ST段抬高型心肌梗死过程表现和结果的影响:美国心脏协会的报告:使命生命线计划。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background-: Prior studies demonstrated that patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction presenting during off-hours (weeknights, weekends, and holidays) have slower reperfusion times. Recent nationwide initiatives have emphasized 24/7 quality care in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. It remains unclear whether patients presenting off-hours versus on-hours receive similar quality care in contemporary practice.Methods and Results-: Using Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network-Get With The Guidelines (ACTION-GWTG) database, we examined ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction performance measures in patients presenting off-hours (n=27 270) versus on-hours (n=15 972; January 2007 to September 2010) at 447 US centers. Key quality measures assessed were aspirin use within first 24 hours, door-to-balloon time, door-to-ECG time, and door-to-needle time. In-hospital risk-adjusted all-cause mortality was calculated. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar. Aspirin use within 24 hours approached 99% in both groups. Among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n=41 979; 97.1%), median door-to-balloon times were 56 versus 72 minutes (P<0.0001) for on-hours versus off-hours. The proportion of patients achieving door-to-balloon time <=90 minutes was 87.8% versus 79.2% (P<0.0001), respectively. There were no differences attaining door-to-ECG time <=10 minutes (73.4% versus 74.3%, P=0.09) and door-to-needle time <=30 minutes (62.3% versus 58.7%; P=0.44) between on-hours versus off-hours. Although in-hospital all-cause mortality was similar (4.2%) in both groups, the risk-adjusted all-cause mortality was higher for patients presenting off-hours (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.26).Conclusions-: In contemporary community practice, achievement of quality performance measures in patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction was high, regardless of time of presentation. Door-to-balloon time was, however, slightly delayed (by an average of 16 minutes), and risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality was 13% higher in patients presenting off-hours.
机译:背景:先前的研究表明,在非工作时间(周末,周末和节假日)出现ST段抬高的心肌梗死患者的再灌注时间较慢。近期全国范围的措施都强调了ST段抬高型心肌梗死的24/7质量护理。目前尚不清楚在下班时间还是下班时间的患者在当代实践中是否获得类似的优质护理。方法和结果:使用急性冠脉治疗和干预措施网络-指南指南(ACTION-GWTG)数据库,我们检查了ST-在美国447个中心的非工作时间(n = 27 270)与非工作时间(n = 15 972; 2007年1月至2010年9月)的患者中,节段性升高心肌梗死的表现指标。评估的关键质量指标是前24小时内使用阿司匹林,上气球时间,上心电图时间和上针时间。计算了医院内风险调整后的全因死亡率。基线人口统计学和临床​​特征相似。两组中24小时内使用阿司匹林的比例接近99%。在接受初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中(n = 41 979; 97.1%),上班时间与下班时间的平均上门至上床时间分别为56分钟和72分钟(P <0.0001)。上门到气球时间<= 90分钟的患者比例分别为87.8%和79.2%(P <0.0001)。在开门和开门之间,门心电图时间<= 10分钟(73.4%比74.3%,P = 0.09)和门针时间<= 30分钟(62.3%比58.7%; P = 0.44)没有差异。小时与下班时间。尽管两组的院内全因死亡率相似(4.2%),但非工作时间患者的风险调整全因死亡率更高(赔率,1.13; 95%置信区间,1.02-1.26)。结论-:在当代社区实践中,无论出现时间长短,表现为ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的质量表现指标均取得了很高的成就。然而,上班时间的患者上气球时间略有延迟(平均延迟16分钟),风险调整后的住院死亡率高出13%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号