首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Evaluation of restorative care vs usual care for older adults receiving an acute episode of home care.
【24h】

Evaluation of restorative care vs usual care for older adults receiving an acute episode of home care.

机译:对接受急性家庭护理的老年人的恢复性护理与常规护理的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Illness and hospitalization often trigger functional decline among older persons. Home care services implemented for functional decline provide an opportunity to intervene to improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare functional status and the likelihood of remaining at home for persons receiving restorative care vs usual home care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Intervention using prospective individual matching conducted between November 1, 1998, and April 30, 2000. Six offices of a home care agency in Connecticut were used. One branch office served as the restorative care unit and the other 5 served as usual care offices. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving home care through the restorative care office who were 65 years or older; in receipt of Medicare-covered home care lasting at least 7 days; with absence of severe cognitive impairment; and not terminal, bedridden, or requiring total care were matched with patients from 1 of the usual care offices. The matching factors included age, sex, race, baseline self-care function, cognitive status, whether hospitalization preceded the home care episode, and date of the home care episode. Of the 712 eligible restorative care patients, 691 (97%) were matched with a usual care patient. INTERVENTION: Restorative care, provided by the home care agency nursing, therapy, and home health aide staff, was based on principles from geriatric medicine, nursing, rehabilitation, and goal attainment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Remaining at home, functional status at completion of the home care episode, and duration and intensity of home care episode. RESULTS: Compared with usual care, and after adjusting for baseline characteristics and other factors, restorative care was associated with a greater likelihood of remaining at home (82% vs 71%; odds ratio [OR], 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-2.69) and a reduced likelihood of visiting an emergency department (10% vs 20%; OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.61). Home care episodes were shorter (mean [SD], 24.8 [26.8] days vs 34.3 [44.2] days; S = -17 821; P<.001). Restorative care patients had better mean (SD) scores than usual care patients in self-care (11.0 [2.1] vs 10.7 [2.5]; P =.07 after adjustment), home management (9.5 [2.9] vs 9.2 [3.0]; P =.05 after adjustment), and mobility (3.3 [0.8] vs 3.2 [0.9]; P =.02 after adjustment). CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests that reorganizing the structure and goals of home care can enhance health outcomes of older patients without increasing health care utilization.
机译:背景:疾病和住院往往会触发老年人的功能下降。为减少功能而实施的家庭护理服务提供了机会以改善结果。目的:比较接受恢复性护理与常规家庭护理的人的功能状态和留在家中的可能性。设计与地点:在1998年11月1日至2000年4月30日期间使用预期的个体匹配进行干预。使用了康涅狄格州一家家庭护理机构的六个办公室。一个分支机构是恢复性护理部门,另外五个分支机构是常规护理部门。参加者:年龄在65岁或以上的通过修复护理办公室接受家庭护理的患者;收到由Medicare承保的至少持续7天的家庭护理;没有严重的认知障碍;而不是终端医疗,卧床不起或需要全面护理的患者与其中一个常规护理办公室的患者相匹配。匹配的因素包括年龄,性别,种族,基线自我保健功能,认知状况,是否在家庭护理发作之前住院以及家庭护理发作的日期。在712名合格的修复护理患者中,有691名(97%)与常规护理患者相匹配。干预措施:家庭护理机构的护理,治疗和家庭保健助手人员提供的恢复性护理是基于老年医学,护理,康复和目标达成的原则。主要观察指标:留在家中,完成家庭护理发作后的功能状态,以及家庭护理发作的持续时间和强度。结果:与常规护理相比,在调整了基线特征和其他因素之后,恢复护理与留在家中的可能性更大(82%比71%;优势比[OR]为1.99; 95%置信区间[CI] ],1.47-2.69)和减少访问急诊室的可能性(10%比20%; OR为0.44; 95%CI为0.32-0.61)。家庭护理发作时间较短(平均[SD]为24.8 [26.8]天,而34.3 [44.2]天; S = -17 821; P <.001)。在自我保健,家庭管理(9.5 [2.9] vs 9.2 [3.0])方面,康复护理患者的自我护理(11.0 [2.1] vs 10.7 [2.5]; P = .07)优于常规护理患者。调整后P = .05)和迁移率(调整后为3.3 [0.8] vs 3.2 [0.9]; P = .02)。结论:该试验表明,重组家庭护理的结构和目标可以提高老年患者的健康状况,而不会增加医疗利用率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号