首页> 外文期刊>Drug safety: An international journal of medical toxicology and drug experience >Comparative tolerability of pharmacological treatments for patent ductus arteriosus.
【24h】

Comparative tolerability of pharmacological treatments for patent ductus arteriosus.

机译:动脉导管未闭的药物治疗相对耐受性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ductus arteriosus is a vascular channel which, although vital to the fetal circulation, rapidly becomes unnecessary and even deleterious after birth. As such, it is 'preprogrammed' to constrict within the first few hours of life. In infants born prematurely this natural closure is often delayed and/or ineffective. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge of the delicately orchestrated control of normal ductal closure, with emphasis on the role of various biochemical mediators. The major focus of this review, however, is on pharmacological approaches designed to prevent and/or treat the persistently patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) which often fails to constrict spontaneously in the premature infant. The standard treatment regimen is based on the administration of 3 doses of the nonselective cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin. We begin by examining, from the vantage point of the ductus, the use of this indomethacin as a tocolytic. It seems that antenatal administration of indomethacin can cause transient, reversible ductus constriction which renders the post-treatment ductus resistant to subsequent closure, both natural and therapeutic. We then review some of the pros and cons associated with the prophylactic administration of indomethacin. Although prophylactic indomethacin is aimed primarily at preventing intraventricular haemorrhages in premature neonates, it does tend to reduce the risk of PDA as well. We then describe some novel therapeutic approaches to effect ductal closure with indomethacin, including the use of continuous infusions to minimise toxic vasoconstrictive phenomena and the use of prolonged maintenance dose to prevent PDA recurrences. Finally we discuss some of the newer agents described more recently which play a role in closing the persistently patent ductus over the next decade. Most prominent of these is ibuprofen which some studies have shown to have less undesirable vasoconstrictive adverse effects. Studies which compare the use of ibuprofen to indomethacin are summarised.
机译:动脉导管是一种血管通道,尽管对胎儿循环至关重要,但在出生后迅速变得不必要甚至有害。因此,在生命的最初几个小时内收缩是“预先编程的”。在早产的婴儿中,这种自然关闭通常会延迟和/或无效。在这篇综述中,我们总结了对正常导管闭合的精心协调控制的当前知识,并着重介绍了各种生化介质的作用。然而,本综述的主要重点是设计用于预防和/或治疗持续性动脉导管未闭(PDA)的药理学方法,该方法通常无法在早产儿中自发地收缩。标准治疗方案基于3剂非选择性环氧化酶抑制剂吲哚美辛的给药。我们从导管的有利位置开始研究使用吲哚美辛作为宫缩抑制剂的用途。似乎在吲哚美辛的产前给药会引起短暂的可逆导管收缩,这使得治疗后导管对随后的天然和治疗性封闭均具有抵抗力。然后,我们回顾了与吲哚美辛预防性给药有关的一些利弊。尽管预防性吲哚美辛主要用于预防早产儿的脑室内出血,但它的确也可以降低PDA的风险。然后,我们描述了一些用消炎痛进行导管闭合的新颖治疗方法,包括使用连续输注以最大程度地减少毒性血管收缩现象,以及使用延长的维持剂量来预防PDA复发。最后,我们讨论了最近描述的一些更新的代理,它们在关闭未来十年持续关闭的专利导管方面发挥了作用。其中最突出的是布洛芬,一些研究表明,布洛芬具有较少的不良血管收缩不良作用。总结了比较布洛芬和消炎痛使用情况的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号