首页> 外文期刊>Hepato-gastroenterology. >Clinical study of cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy in combination with docetaxel, 5-flourouracil and leucovorin intravenous chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced-stage gastric carcinoma
【24h】

Clinical study of cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy in combination with docetaxel, 5-flourouracil and leucovorin intravenous chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced-stage gastric carcinoma

机译:顺铂高温腹腔灌注化疗联合多西紫杉醇,5-氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙静脉化疗联合治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aims: The purpose of this study is to observe and compare the preliminary efficacy and side effects of docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin intravenous chemotherapy in combination with cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methodology: Retrospectively analyzed 101 patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin intravenous chemotherapy or intravenous administration of docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combined with cisplatin hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy, 49 patients in intravenous chemotherapy (VC) group, 52 patients in hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (HIPEC) group. Results: The response rate was 44.9% (22/49) in VC group and 65.4% (34/52) in HlPEC group, among which there was 1 case of CR, and the difference was statistically significant (p= 0.038). For CBR evaluation, the effective rate was 65.3% (32/49) in VC group and 82.7% (43/52) in HIPEC group, and the difference was statistically significant (p= 0.0458). The median progress free survival time (PFS) was 3.4 months in VC group and 4.6 months in HIPEC group, the difference was statistically significant (p= 0.045). The median overall survival time (OS) was 6.7 months in VC group and 7.5 months in HIPEC group, the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.201). The main side effects in two groups were well tolerated, and there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: The short-term efficacy and PFS of HIPEC plus intravenous chemotherapy were better than single intravenous chemotherapy, and there was no significant improvement in OS, the side effects were similar in two groups with good tolerability.
机译:背景/目的:本研究的目的是观察和比较多西他赛,5-氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸静脉注射化疗与顺铂高温腹膜内灌注化疗联合治疗晚期胃癌的初步疗效和副作用。方法:回顾性分析101例晚期胃癌患者接受多西他赛,5-氟尿嘧啶,亚叶酸和顺铂静脉化疗或静脉给予多西他赛,5-氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸与顺铂高温腹膜内灌注化疗,静脉化疗(VC)组49例,52例腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)组患者。结果:VC组有效率44.9%(22/49),HlPEC组有65.4%(34/52),其中1例CR,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.038)。对于CBR评估,VC组的有效率为65.3%(32/49),HIPEC组的有效率为82.7%(43/52),差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.0458)。 VC组的中位无进展生存时间(PFS)为3.4个月,HIPEC组的中位无进展生存时间为4.6个月,差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.045)。 VC组的中位总生存时间(OS)为6.7个月,HIPEC组的中位总生存时间为7.5个月,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.201)。两组的主要不良反应耐受性良好,差异无统计学意义。结论:HIPEC联合静脉化疗的近期疗效和PFS均优于单次静脉化疗,OS无明显改善,两组的不良反应相似,耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号