...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants >Evaluation of the effectiveness of dental implant therapy in a practice-based network (FOCUS).
【24h】

Evaluation of the effectiveness of dental implant therapy in a practice-based network (FOCUS).

机译:在基于实践的网络(FOCUS)中评估种植牙治疗的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Evaluations of multicenter clinical trials are needed to determine the effectiveness of care in routine implant therapy in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-two clinicians in 75 clinics in 13 countries recruited five subjects per clinic who were in need of a minimum of two dental implants to restore a partially edentulous quadrant and were followed for a minimum of 1 year after loading. A centralized Internet-based case report form was developed to coordinate data recording. Data entry was done by each clinic, with follow-up source verification. RESULTS: The study recruited 549 subjects in 101 clinics with 1,893 implants placed. Three hundred forty subjects completed the 1-year recall (gender distribution of 56% female, 44% male; mean age of 57 years with a range of 18 to 84 years). In all, 1,246 dental implants were followed; a majority of subjects had two to four implants. Twenty-eight percent of subjects received osseous grafting prior to or coincident with implant placement. In the maxilla, 779 (63%) implants were placed, 256 in the anterior and 523 in the posterior; in the mandible, 467 implants were placed, 85 in the anterior and 382 in the posterior arch. The median edentulous period prior to implant placement was 24 months (range, 0 to 480 months); 46% of all patients received implants within 12 months of tooth loss. At 1 year after prosthesis insertion, 15 subjects had lost a total of 17 implants, for a cumulative implant survival rate of 98.6%. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests indicated a higher risk of implant loss at sites with advanced resorption and for wider-diameter implants (5-mm tapered body). There was no statistical relationship with implant loss relative to implant length or anatomic location within the oral cavity. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes support the need for ongoing involvement of clinicians in routine practice assessments of patient-based outcomes of implant therapy.
机译:目的:需要进行多中心临床试验评估,以确定临床实践中常规植入治疗的护理效果。材料与方法:13个国家/地区的75个诊所的92位临床医生每个诊所招募了5名受试者,他们至少需要两颗牙种植体来恢复部分无牙的象限,并且在加载后至少随访1年。开发了基于Internet的集中式病例报告表以协调数据记录。数据输入由每个诊所完成,并进行后续来源验证。结果:该研究招募了101家诊所的549名受试者,植入了1,893枚植入物。 340名受试者完成了为期1年的回忆(性别分布为56%的女性,44%的男性;平均年龄为57岁,范围为18至84岁)。总共随访了1,246颗牙种植体;大多数受试者有两到四个植入物。 28%的受试者在植入植入物之前或同时进行了骨移植。在上颌骨中,植入了779个(63%)植入物,前部植入256个,后部植入523个;在下颌骨中,放置了467个植入物,前牙放置了85个,后牙弓放置了382个。种植体植入前的平均无牙期为24个月(范围为0至480个月)。所有患者中有46%在掉牙后12个月内接受了植入物。植入假体后1年,有15名受试者总共丢失了17个植入物,累计植入物存活率为98.6%。卡方检验和费舍尔的精确测试表明,在具有高吸收率的部位以及直径较大的植入物(5毫米锥形体)处,植入物丢失的风险更高。相对于种植体长度或口腔内的解剖位置,与种植体损失没有统计学关系。结论:结局支持临床医生持续参与基于患者的植入治疗结局的常规实践评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号