首页> 外文期刊>Transplant international : >Methods, strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of bioequivalence tests with special regard to immunosuppressive drugs
【24h】

Methods, strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of bioequivalence tests with special regard to immunosuppressive drugs

机译:生物等效性测试的方法,优势,劣势和局限性,特别是免疫抑制药物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Within the field of solid organ transplantation, the patents for a number of immunosuppressive drugs have expired in the last few years. Tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil are now available as generic drugs. In some countries, the market penetration of these generic formulations is as high as 70%, whereas in some other countries, this figure is below 10%. Several professional societies have published position papers on the risks and benefits of generic substitution of immunosuppressive drugs. It often appears that transplant professionals are not fully aware of the requirements for registration of generic drugs. This article describes the registration requirements with a focus on bioequivalence testing, the strengths and weaknesses in this process, and the differences between Europe and the US.
机译:发明内容在实体器官移植领域中,许多免疫抑制药物的专利在最近几年已经过期。他克莫司,环孢素和霉酚酸酯现已作为非专利药上市。在某些国家,这些仿制药的市场渗透率高达70%,而在其他一些国家,这一数字还不到10%。几个专业协会已经发表了关于免疫抑制药物通用替代品的风险和收益的立场文件。通常,移植专业人士似乎并不完全了解注册仿制药的要求。本文介绍了注册要求,重点是生物等效性测试,此过程的优缺点以及欧美之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号