首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic Drug Monitoring >Comparison of Everolimus QMS Immunoassay on Architect ci4100 and Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry: Lack of Agreement in Organ-Transplanted Patients
【24h】

Comparison of Everolimus QMS Immunoassay on Architect ci4100 and Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry: Lack of Agreement in Organ-Transplanted Patients

机译:建筑师ci4100的依维莫司QMS免疫测定与液相色谱/质谱法的比较:器官移植患者中缺乏一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the method of choice for the determination of everolimus whole blood concentrations but is not always available. Therefore, immunoassays have been developed for clinical monitoring of everolimus. In previous studies, the Quantitative Microsphere System (QMS) immunoassay had a positive bias compared with LC-MS/MS, but was judged acceptable, although clinical agreement (eg, 95% limits of agreement) was not reported. The objective of this study was to assess whether the agreement between the QMS assay and an LC-MS/MS method was clinically acceptable for use interchangeably in therapeutic everolimus monitoring.
机译:背景:液相色谱质谱法(LC-MS / MS)是测定依维莫司全血浓度的一种选择方法,但并非总是可用。因此,已经开发了用于依维莫司临床监测的免疫测定法。在先前的研究中,与LC-MS / MS相比,定量微球系统(QMS)免疫测定具有正偏倚,但尽管未报告临床协议(例如,协议限制的95%),但仍被认为可以接受。这项研究的目的是评估QMS测定法和LC-MS / MS方法之间的一致性是否在临床上可以互换用于治疗性依维莫司监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号