...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic Drug Monitoring >Monitoring Cyclosporin in Blood: Between-Assay Differences at Trough and 2 Hours Post-dose (C2).
【24h】

Monitoring Cyclosporin in Blood: Between-Assay Differences at Trough and 2 Hours Post-dose (C2).

机译:监测血液中的环孢菌素:低谷期和给药后2小时(C2)的分析间差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With the introduction of a cyclosporin monitoring strategy based on the use of a sample collected 2 hours after dosing (C2) rather than the predose sample (C0), there was concern that the differences in blood cyclosporin results from the various assay systems would result in assay-specific target ranges for C2 monitoring. In addition, it was not known if the different proportion of cyclosporin metabolites in the blood 2 hours after dosing compared with that seen in predose samples would alter the relationship between the various assay methodologies. The aim of this study was to address these issues using blood samples from patients who had undergone kidney and liver transplantation. To do this, paired samples were collected predose and 2 hours after cyclosporin dosing at various periods following transplantation in kidney (88 paired samples) and liver (165 paired samples) transplant recipients. Cyclosporin was measured in these samples using five different immunoassays (radioimmunoassay, two fluorescent polarization immunoassays, and two homogeneous immunoassays) and high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results of the study showed that when using these immunoassays to measure blood cyclosporin concentrations at C0, the cross-reactivity of the antibodies in the different immunoassay kits resulted in target therapeutic ranges that would need to vary between assays to maintain parity. However, when the same assays were used to measure the blood cyclosporin concentration at C2, the results were congruent, and assay-specific target therapeutic ranges should not be necessary. Thus, when adopting a C2 monitoring strategy, it is possible to use target therapeutic ranges that are independent of the assay system used.
机译:引入环孢菌素监测策略是基于使用给药后2小时的样品(C2)而不是服药前的样品(C0),因此人们担心,各种测定系统产生的血液环孢素结果差异会导致C2监测的检测特定目标范围。此外,与给药前样品相比,给药后2小时血液中环孢菌素代谢物比例的不同是否会改变各种测定方法之间的关系,尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是使用来自肾脏和肝脏移植患者的血液样本来解决这些问题。为此,在肾脏(88个配对样品)和肝脏(165个配对样品)移植受者的移植后不同时期,应在给药前和给药后2小时收集配对样品。使用五种不同的免疫测定法(放射免疫测定法,两次荧光偏振免疫测定法和两次均相免疫测定法)以及高效液相色谱-质谱法测量了这些样品中的环孢菌素。研究结果表明,当使用这些免疫测定法测量C0时血液中环孢菌素的浓度时,不同免疫测定试剂盒中抗体的交叉反应性导致目标治疗范围需要在各测定法之间变化才能保持均等。但是,当使用相同的测定方法测量C2时血液中环孢菌素的浓度时,结果是一致的,因此不需要特定测定的目标治疗范围。因此,当采用C2监测策略时,可以使用独立于所用测定系统的靶治疗范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号