...
首页> 外文期刊>The Veterinary Journal >Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A scale-construction study
【24h】

Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A scale-construction study

机译:用马乌特勒支大学疼痛综合评估量表(EQUUS-COMPASS)和马乌特勒支大学疼痛面部评估量表(EQUUS-FAP)监测急性马内脏疼痛:量表构建研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although recognition of equine pain has been studied extensively over the past decades there is still need for improvement in objective identification of pain in horses with acute colic. This study describes scale construction and clinical applicability of the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP) in horses with acute colic. A cohort follow-up study was performed using 50 adult horses (n = 25 with acute colic, n = 25 controls). Composite pain scores were assessed by direct observations, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were assessed from video clips. Colic patients were assessed at arrival, and on the first and second mornings after arrival. Both the EQUUS-COMPASS and EQUUS-FAP scores showed high inter-observer reliability (ICC = 0.98 for EQUUS-COMPASS, ICC = 0.93 for EQUUS-FAP, P 0.001), while a moderate inter-observer reliability for the VAS scores was found (ICC = 0.63, P 0.001). The cut-off value for differentiation between healthy and colic horses for the EQUUS-COMPASS was 5, and for differentiation between conservatively treated and surgically treated or euthanased patients it was 11. For the EQUUS-FAP, cut-off values were 4 and 6, respectively.
机译:尽管在过去的几十年中已经对马痛的识别进行了广泛的研究,但是仍然需要改善对急性绞痛马的疼痛的客观识别。这项研究描述了马匹乌特勒支大学综合疼痛评估量表(EQUUS-COMPASS)和马匹乌特勒支大学疼痛面部评估量表(EQUUS-FAP)在急性绞痛马匹中的规模和临床适用性。使用50头成年马(n = 25急性绞痛,n = 25对照)进行了队列研究。通过直接观察评估复合疼痛评分,从视频剪辑评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。在到达时以及到达后的第一个和第二个早晨对绞痛患者进行了评估。 EQUUS-COMPASS和EQUUS-FAP评分均显示出较高的观察者间可靠性(EQUUS-COMPASS的ICC = 0.98,EQUUS-FAP的ICC = 0.93,P <0.001),而VAS评分的观察者间中等可靠性为实测值(ICC = 0.63,P <0.001)。对于EQUUS-COMPASS,健康马和绞痛马之间的区分值为5,对于保守治疗和外科手术或安乐死患者的区分值为11。对于EQUUS-FAP,区分值为4和6。 , 分别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号