...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Detection of telomerase in urine by 3 methods: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy for bladder cancer.
【24h】

Detection of telomerase in urine by 3 methods: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy for bladder cancer.

机译:通过三种方法检测尿液中的端粒酶:评估膀胱癌的诊断准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: New, noninvasive methods are needed for the diagnosis, followup and screening of patients with bladder cancer. Three methods of detecting telomerase were evaluated in this aspect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 200 patients diagnosed with bladder carcinoma, 85 with benign bladder lesions and 30 healthy individuals who served as the control group. All underwent serological schistosomiasis antibody assay in serum, urine cytology and estimation of relative telomerase activity by telomeric repeat amplification protocol, human telomerase RNA by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and human telomerase reverse transcriptase by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in urothelial cells from voided urine. RESULTS: The concordance between the positive rates of telomerase detected by the 3 methods was high (90% to 95%). Results were significantly higher in the malignant group than in the benign and control groups. There was a significant difference among the results of the 3 methods in relation to different clinicopathological factors. Overall the sensitivity of human telomerase reverse transcriptase for detecting bladder cancer was the highest compared to that of human telomerase RNA, relative telomerase activity and urine cytology (96%, 92%, 75% and 75%, respectively). Combinations of telomerase results with urine cytology were not useful except in cases of relative telomerase activity. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of human telomerase reverse transcriptase in urine by real-time polymerase chain reaction, followed by human telomerase RNA by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, improves sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of bladder cancer. However, regarding cost-effectiveness, human telomerase RNA is superior.
机译:目的:需要新的,非侵入性的方法来诊断,随访和筛查膀胱癌患者。在这方面,评估了三种检测端粒酶的方法。材料与方法:本研究纳入200例诊断为膀胱癌的患者,85例患有良性膀胱病变的患者和30例健康人作为对照组。所有患者均接受血清学血吸虫病抗体测定,尿液细胞学检查,并通过端粒重复扩增方案评估相对端粒酶活性,通过逆转录酶-聚合酶链反应检测人端粒酶RNA,并通过实时逆转录酶-聚合酶链反应在尿路上皮中评估人端粒酶逆转录酶。尿液中的细胞。结果:3种方法检测的端粒酶阳性率之间的一致性较高(90%至95%)。恶性组的结果显着高于良性和对照组。三种方法的结果在不同的临床病理因素方面存在显着差异。总体而言,与端粒酶RNA,相对端粒酶活性和尿液细胞学检查相比,端粒酶逆转录酶检测膀胱癌的敏感性是最高的(分别为96%,92%,75%和75%)。端粒酶结果与尿液细胞学检查相结合是没有用的,除非相对端粒酶活性较高。结论:通过实时聚合酶链反应检测尿中人端粒酶逆转录酶,然后通过逆转录酶-聚合酶链反应检测人端粒酶RNA,可提高诊断膀胱癌的敏感性和特异性。但是,就成本效益而言,人类端粒酶RNA更为优越。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号