首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
【24h】

Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

机译:比较根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术和机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的住院时间。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive surgery has been shown to decrease postoperative morbidity and length of stay for a number of surgical procedures. Furthermore, length of stay after open radical prostatectomy has decreased dramatically during the last decade. We examined differences in length of stay between a prospectively evaluated cohort of patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2003 and March 2006, 1,003 radical prostatectomies were performed at our hospital. Data were collected in prospective fashion and a comparison was made between 374 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and 629 who underwent robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Length of stay, factors influencing length of stay, readmission rates and unscheduled clinic or emergency room visits were evaluated. Patients in the 2 groups were treated using the same clinical care pathway. RESULTS: Overall 94.3% of patients in the radical retropubic prostatectomy group and 97.5% in the robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy group were discharged home on or before postoperative day 1. Mean length of stay in the radical retropubic and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy groups was 1.25 (median 1.09) and 1.17 days (median 1.03), which was similar and not statistically different (p=0.27). Readmission rates were similar in robot assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy patients (7% and 5%, respectively, p=0.12). Unscheduled clinic or emergency room visits were the same in the robot assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy groups (10%, p=0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy or robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy can be treated on the same clinical pathway. A targeted hospital discharge date of postoperative day 1 can be achieved in the majority of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Readmission rates or unscheduled hospital visits are necessary in a small percent of patients treated with an early discharge program, of which the majority are caused by ileus.
机译:目的:微创手术已被证明可以减少许多手术程序的术后发病率和住院时间。此外,在过去的十年中,根治性前列腺切除术后的住院时间显着减少。我们检查了经过前瞻性评估的行根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术和机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的患者之间的住院时间差异。材料与方法:2003年1月至2006年3月,我院进行了1,003例根治性前列腺切除术。以前瞻性方式收集数据,并比较了374例行根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术的患者和629例行机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的患者。评估住院时间,影响住院时间,再入院率以及计划外的诊所或急诊室就诊的因素。两组患者均使用相同的临床护理途径进行治疗。结果:根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术组中94.3%的患者和机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术组中97.5%的患者在术后第1天或之前出院。在根治性耻骨后前列腺和机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术组中的平均住院时间为1.25(中位数为1.09)和1.17天(中位数为1.03),这是相似且无统计学差异(p = 0.27)。机器人辅助的腹腔镜和根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术患者的再入院率相似(分别为7%和5%,p = 0.12)。机器人辅助的腹腔镜和根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术组的计划外诊所或急诊室就诊次数相同(10%,p = 0.95)。结论:行根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术或机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的患者可采用相同的临床途径治疗。大多数接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者均可在术后第1天达到目标出院日期。在接受早期出院计划治疗的患者中,有一小部分需要重新住院率或不定期的医院就诊,其中大多数是由肠梗阻引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号