...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >Comparison of drain clamp after bilateral total knee arthroplasty.
【24h】

Comparison of drain clamp after bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

机译:双侧全膝关节置换术后引流钳的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Suction drains provide an easy and feasible method for controlling hemorrhage after total knee arthroplasty. However, there has been no compromise regarding the optimum clamping time for these drains. We conducted a randomized clinical trial in 50 patients to compare 12-hour drain clamping and continuous drainage after total knee arthroplasty in terms of wound complications, blood loss, and articular arc of motion. To eliminate any other factor except duration of clamping, we chose to compare only knees belonging to a single patient and to restrict the study to those knees undergoing surgery due to osteoarthritis. From a total of 100 knees (50 patients) studied, the 12-hour-clamping method resulted in a significantly smaller amount of postoperative blood loss (p < 0.001). The passive ranges of motion and wound complications were not significantly different between the two groups.
机译:抽吸引流为控制全膝关节置换术后的出血提供了一种简便可行的方法。但是,这些排水管的最佳钳位时间并没有妥协。我们对50位患者进行了一项随机临床试验,比较了全膝关节置换术后12小时的引流钳夹和连续引流的伤口并发症,失血和关节运动弧度。为了消除除钳夹时间以外的任何其他因素,我们选择仅比较属于单个患者的膝盖,并将研究范围限于由于骨关节炎而接受手术的膝盖。在总共研究的100个膝盖(50例患者)中,采用12小时钳制方法导致的术后失血量明显减少(p <0.001)。两组的被动运动范围和伤口并发症无明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号