...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Modern Retrograde Intramedullary Nails Versus Periarticular Locked Plates for Supracondylar Femur Fractures After Total Knee Arthroplasty
【24h】

Modern Retrograde Intramedullary Nails Versus Periarticular Locked Plates for Supracondylar Femur Fractures After Total Knee Arthroplasty

机译:全膝关节置换术后现代逆行髓内钉与i突锁定钢板治疗Per上股骨骨折

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Distal periprosthetic femur fractures above total knee arthroplas-ties are difficult fractures to treat for orthopaedic surgeons. With increasing numbers of total knee arthroplasties performed, this specific complication is becoming more prevalent. The management of these fractures is complicated by several variables, which include osteoporotic bone in the distal femoral metaphyseal region, short distal segments for adequate fixation, surgical exposure and blood loss, nonunion, malunion, and malalignment. Recently, peri-articular locked plating techniques have become popular as the most common fixation method. However, consensus does not currently exist within the orthopaedic community or the peer-reviewed literature to establish which implant, fixation strategy or technique is optimal for a successful treatment outcome.The purpose of this study is to retrospectively compare the results of modern IM nails with locked distal fixation to periarticular locked plating. Our hypothesis is that the modern nails will have equivalent success to the periarticular locked plates in achieving clinical and radiographic union.
机译:全膝关节置换以上的假体周围股骨远端骨折很难为整形外科医生治疗。随着进行的全膝关节置换术数量的增加,这种特定的并发症变得越来越普遍。这些骨折的处理因多个变量而变得复杂,其中包括股骨干eal端区域的骨质疏松骨,适当固定的远端短段,手术暴露和失血,骨不连,畸形畸形和畸形。近来,作为最普通的固定方法,关节周围锁定电镀技术已经普及。然而,目前在骨科界或经同行评审的文献中尚无共识来确定哪种植入物,固定策略或技术最适合成功的治疗结果。本研究的目的是回顾性比较现代IM钉与远端锁定固定到关节周围锁定钢板。我们的假设是,现代指甲在实现临床和放射照相结合方面将具有与关节周围锁定板相当的成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号