...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Latex-free gloves: safer for whom?
【24h】

Latex-free gloves: safer for whom?

机译:无乳胶手套:对谁更安全?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Increasing latex hypersensitivity among patients and health care workers has prompted the development of latex-free surgical gloves. Latex-free gloves must perform equally as the existing latex standard. We analyzed perforation rates in a clinical trial comparing latex and a latex-free alternative during primary hip and knee arthroplasty. The overall latex glove perforation rate was 8.4% compared with 21.6% for the latex-free alternative (chi(2) P < .001). The operation perforation rate for latex gloves was 34.4% compared with 80% for latex-free gloves (chi(2) P < .001). We suggest that the latex-free glove tested cannot provide a reliable barrier between the surgeon and the patient. As such, we question the safety of these gloves and the standards sets by the regulators.
机译:患者和医护人员中乳胶超敏性的提高促使无乳外科手套的发展。无乳胶手套必须具有与现有乳胶标准相同的性能。我们在一项临床试验中分析了穿孔率,该试验比较了乳头和膝关节置换术中的乳胶和无乳胶替代品。乳胶手套的总穿孔率为8.4%,而无乳胶手套的穿孔率为21.6%(chi(2)P <.001)。乳胶手套的手术穿孔率为34.4%,而无乳胶手套的手术穿孔率为80%(chi(2)P <.001)。我们建议所测试的无乳胶手套不能在外科医生和患者之间提供可靠的屏障。因此,我们质疑这些手套的安全性以及监管机构制定的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号