...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Consistency in compensatory eating responses following acute exercise in inactive, overweight and obese women
【24h】

Consistency in compensatory eating responses following acute exercise in inactive, overweight and obese women

机译:非运动,超重和肥胖妇女急性运动后代偿饮食反应的一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is often assumed that some individuals reliably increase energy intake (EI) post-exercise ('compensators') and some do not ('non-compensators'), leading researchers to examine the characteristics that distinguish these two groups. However, it is unclear whether EI post-exercise is stable over time. The present study examined whether compensatory eating responses to a single exercise bout are consistent within individuals across three pairs of trials. Physically inactive, overweight/obese women (n 28, BMI 30.3 (SD 2.9) kg/m(2)) participated in three pairs of testing sessions, with each pair consisting of an exercise (30 min of moderate-intensity walking) and resting testing day. EI was measured using a buffet meal 1 h post-exercise/rest. For each pair, the difference in EI (EIdiff = EIex - EIrest) was calculated, where EIex is the EI of the exercise session and EIrest is the EI of the resting session, and women were classified as a 'compensator' (EIex. EIrest) or 'non-compensator' (EIex = EIrest). The average EI on exercise days (3328.0 (SD 1686.2) kJ) was similar to those on resting days (3269.4 (SD 1582.4) kJ) (P - 0.67). Although EI was reliable within individuals across the three resting days (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.75, 95% CI 0.60, 0.87; P, 0.001) and three exercise days (ICC 0.83, 95% CI 0.70, 0.91; P, 0.001), the ICC for EIdiff across the three pairs of trials was low (ICC 0.20, 95% CI -0.02, 0.45; P = 0.04), suggesting that compensatory eating post-exercise is not a stable construct. Moreover, the classification of 'compensators'/'non-compensators' was not reliable (k = 0.048; P = 0.66). The results were unaltered when 'relative' EI was used, which considers the energy expenditure of the exercise/resting sessions. Acute compensatory EI following an exercise bout is not reliable in overweight women. Seeking to understand what distinguishes 'compensators' from 'non-compensators' based on a single eating episode post-exercise is not justified.
机译:通常认为,有些人在运动后会可靠地增加能量摄入(EI)(“补偿器”),而有些人却没有(“非补偿器”),导致研究人员研究区分这两组的特征。但是,目前还不清楚EI运动后是否随着时间的推移而稳定。本研究检查了在三对试验中个体对一次运动的补偿性饮食反应是否一致。缺乏运动能力,超重/肥胖的妇女(n 28,BMI 30.3(SD 2.9)kg / m(2))参加了三对测试,每对包括锻炼(中等强度的步行30分钟)和休息测试日。运动/休息后1小时用自助餐测量EI。对于每对,计算出EI的差(EIdiff = EIex-EIrest),其中EIex是锻炼过程的EI,EIrest是休息过程的EI,并且女性被归类为“补偿者”(EIex。EIrest)。 )或“非补偿器”(EIex <= EIrest)。运动日的平均EI(3328.0(SD 1686.2)kJ)与休息日的平均EI(3269.4(SD 1582.4)kJ)相似(P-0.67)。尽管EI在三个休息日(组内相关系数(ICC)0.75,95%CI 0.60,0.87; P,0.001)和三个运动日(ICC 0.83,95%CI 0.70,0.91; P,0.001)内在个体内是可靠的,在三对试验中EIdiff的ICC较低(ICC为0.20、95%CI -0.02、0.45; P = 0.04),表明运动后的代偿饮食不是一个稳定的结构。此外,“补偿器” /“非补偿器”的分类并不可靠(k = 0.048; P = 0.66)。当使用“相对” EI时,结果保持不变,EI考虑了运动/休息时间的能量消耗。运动超重后,急性代偿性EI不可靠。试图根据运动后的一次进食发作来了解什么将“补偿者”与“非补偿者”区分开来是没有道理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号