...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Postprandial lipid responses to standard carbohydrates used to determine glycaemic index values.
【24h】

Postprandial lipid responses to standard carbohydrates used to determine glycaemic index values.

机译:餐后脂质对用于确定血糖指数值的标准碳水化合物的反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prior studies assessing the metabolic effects of different types of carbohydrates have focused on their glycaemic response. However, the response of postprandial cardiometabolic risk indicators has not been considered in these studies. The present study assessed postprandial lipid responses to two forms of carbohydrates used as reference foods for glycaemic index determinations, white bread (50 g available carbohydrate) and glucose (50 g), under controlled conditions and with intra-individual replicate determinations. A total of twenty adults (20-70 years) underwent two cycles of challenges with each pair of reference foods (four challenges/person), administered in a random order on separate days under standard conditions. Serum lipids (total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, TAG and NEFA), glucose and insulin were monitored for 5 h post-ingestion. Oral glucose resulted in greater glycaemic and insulinaemic responses than white bread for the first 90 min and a greater subsequent decline after 120 min (P =0.0001). The initial decline in serum NEFA concentrations was greater after the oral glucose than after the white bread challenge, as was the rebound after 150 min (P =0.001). Nevertheless, the type of carbohydrate had no significant effect on postprandial total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol concentrations. Following an initial modest rise in TAG concentrations in response to both challenges, the values dropped below the fasting values for oral glucose but not for the white bread challenge. These data suggest that the type of carbohydrate used to determine the glycaemic index, bread or glucose, has little or modest effects on postprandial plasma cholesterol concentrations. Differences in TAG and NEFA concentrations over the 5 h time period were modest, and their clinical relevance is unclear
机译:先前评估不同类型碳水化合物的代谢作用的研究集中在其血糖反应上。但是,这些研究未考虑餐后心脏代谢风险指标的反应。本研究评估了餐后脂质对两种形式的碳水化合物的血糖反应,这些碳水化合物被用作血糖指数测定的参考食品,白面包(50 g有效碳水化合物)和葡萄糖(50 g),在受控条件下和个体内重复测定。总共二十名成年人(20-70岁)接受了两轮挑战,每对参考食物(每人四个挑战)在标准条件下分别在不同的日子随机服用。摄入后5小时监测血清脂质(总胆固醇,LDL-胆固醇,HDL-胆固醇,TAG和NEFA),葡萄糖和胰岛素。在开始的90分钟内,口服葡萄糖比白面包产生更大的血糖和胰岛素反应,在120分钟后,其下降幅度更大(P = 0.0001)。口服葡萄糖后,血清NEFA浓度的初始下降要比白面包激发后更大,在150分钟后反弹也是如此(P = 0.001)。然而,碳水化合物的类型对餐后总胆固醇,LDL-胆固醇和HDL-胆固醇浓度没有显着影响。在对这两种挑战做出反应后,TAG浓度开始适度上升之后,该值降至空腹血糖值以下,而非白面包挑战。这些数据表明,用于确定血糖指数的碳水化合物类型(面包或葡萄糖)对餐后血浆胆固醇浓度影响很小或不大。在5小时内TAG和NEFA浓度的差异不大,其临床相关性尚不清楚

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号