...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Retroperitoneoscopy-assisted total nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.
【24h】

Retroperitoneoscopy-assisted total nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.

机译:腹腔镜辅助全肾切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To apply retroperitoneoscopy-assisted nephroureterectomy (RTN) and examine its benefit compared with traditional open nephroureterectomy. The reference standard of treatment for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma is standard total nephroureterectomy (STN) with excision of a bladder cuff. METHODS: Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed, followed by open distal ureterectomy with excision of a bladder cuff. The specimen was removed en bloc from the lower pararectal incision that was used during distal ureterectomy. From January 1999, 17 patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma underwent this procedure at our institution. For comparison, the most recent 17 STNs were also reviewed. RESULTS: The operative time was longer in the RTN group than in the STN group but not to a significant extent (239.5 versus 286.8 minutes; P = 0.2663). On the other hand, the estimated blood loss, duration to potential discharge, and recovery to normal activities were significantly reduced in the RTN group (151.1 versus 299.6 minutes, 2.7 versus 4.2 days, and 15.9 versus 19.3 days; P = 0.0262, 0.0479, and 0.0363, respectively). From an oncologic standpoint, local recurrence occurred in 1 patient of the RTN group and 4 patients of the STN group (median follow-up of 8.8 and 23.0 months, respectively). No significant difference was detected in the disease-free survival rate between the two groups (P = 0.6775). CONCLUSIONS: RTN can make total nephroureterectomy less invasive. From an oncologic standpoint, although it revealed a disease-free survival rate comparable with the standard open procedure with limited follow-up, further follow-up of additional cases with simultaneous extended lymphadenectomy is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure.
机译:目的:应用腹膜后镜辅助肾切除术(RTN),并检查其与传统开放性肾切除术相比的益处。上尿路移行细胞癌的治疗参考标准是标准的全肾切除术(STN)并切除膀胱套。方法:行腹腔镜根治性肾切除术,然后行开放性远端输尿管切除术并切除膀胱套囊。从远端输尿管切除术中使用的直肠下下切口整体取出标本。从1999年1月开始,我们机构对17例上尿路移行细胞癌患者进行了该手术。为了进行比较,还审查了最近的17个STN。结果:RTN组的手术时间比STN组更长,但没有显着性差异(239.5分钟对286.8分钟; P = 0.2663)。另一方面,RTN组的估计失血量,潜在放电持续时间和恢复正常活动的时间明显减少(151.1对299.6分钟,2.7对4.2天,15.9对19.3天; P = 0.0262、0.0479,和0.0363)。从肿瘤学的角度来看,RTN组1例患者和STN组4例患者发生局部复发(中位随访时间分别为8.8和23.0个月)。两组之间的无病生存率没​​有显着差异(P = 0.6775)。结论:RTN可使全肾切除术的侵入性降低。从肿瘤学的角度来看,尽管它显示出与标准开放式手术相当的无病生存率,且随访时间有限,但为评估该手术的有效性,还需要对其他病例同时行扩展的淋巴结清扫术进行进一步随访。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号