...
首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Nomogram ranking as new objective evaluation method in various treatment strategies for patients with prostate cancer with various clinicopathologic backgrounds.
【24h】

Nomogram ranking as new objective evaluation method in various treatment strategies for patients with prostate cancer with various clinicopathologic backgrounds.

机译:线型图作为具有各种临床病理背景的前列腺癌患者的各种治疗策略中的新客观评估方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To propose a "nomogram ranking" that gives an objective assessment of any treatment strategy from various institutions. It is difficult to objectively compare treatment outcomes for patients with prostate cancer among institutions because of the large differences in the clinicopathologic backgrounds and treatment strategies. METHODS: From January 2001 to September 2005, 71 consecutive patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and subsequent high-dose rate brachytherapy combined with long-term hormonal therapy. The 5-year prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis for all patients and also for subdivided patients according to prostate-specific antigen range or Gleason score. Also, the 5-year PFS rates were estimated by Kattan nomogram, assuming that all 71 patients were treated with 72 Gy of EBRT or EBRT plus neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. The estimated PFS rates were ranked in order from worse to better outcomes (nomogram ranking). The 5-year PFS rates estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed the position within the nomogram ranking. RESULTS: The 5-year PFS rate estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis for all 71 patients was 82.4%. The median 5-year PFS rate estimated by Kattan nomogram was 66%, assuming that all patients were treated with EBRT and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. The actual 5-year PFS rate estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis ranked 56 of 71 patients assumed to be treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and EBRT. Subdivided analyses revealed that our treatment strategy might be advantageous for patients with a Gleason score of 7 or less, regardless of the prostate-specific antigen level. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram ranking might be an objective and reliable assessment method of various treatment strategies for patients with prostate cancer.
机译:目的:提出“诺模图排名”,以客观评估各种机构的任何治疗策略。由于临床病理背景和治疗策略的巨大差异,很难在机构之间客观比较前列腺癌患者的治疗结果。方法:从2001年1月至2005年9月,连续71例局部晚期前列腺癌患者接受了外部放射线疗法(EBRT)以及随后的高剂量率近距离放射治疗和长期激素治疗。通过Kaplan-Meier分析,根据前列腺特异性抗原范围或格里森评分,对所有患者以及细分患者计算5年前列腺特异性抗原无复发生存率(PFS)。同样,假设所有71名患者均接受72 Gy EBRT或EBRT加上新辅助激素治疗,则可通过Kattan nomogram估算5年PFS率。估计的PFS率按从差到好的顺序排序(列线图排名)。 Kaplan-Meier分析估计的5年PFS率评估了列线图排名中的位置。结果:Kaplan-Meier分析估计的所有71例患者的5年PFS率为82.4%。假设所有患者均接受了EBRT和新辅助激素治疗,那么根据Kattan nomogram估算的5年中位PFS率为66%。由Kaplan-Meier分析估计的实际5年PFS率在假定接受新辅助激素治疗和EBRT治疗的71名患者中排名56。细分分析显示,无论前列腺特异性抗原水平如何,我们的治疗策略对格里森评分为7或更低的患者可能都是有利的。结论:列线图排名可能是一种客观可靠的评估前列腺癌患者各种治疗策略的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号