...
首页> 外文期刊>Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation >A comparison of three methods of assessing differential item functioning (DIF) in the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: ordinal logistic regression, Rasch analysis and the Mantel chi-square procedure.
【24h】

A comparison of three methods of assessing differential item functioning (DIF) in the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: ordinal logistic regression, Rasch analysis and the Mantel chi-square procedure.

机译:在医院焦虑抑郁量表中评估差异项功能(DIF)的三种方法的比较:有序逻辑回归,Rasch分析和Mantel卡方检验程序。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ordinal logistic regression, Rasch analysis and contingency table methods yielded consistent results when identifying DIF in the HADS depression and HADS anxiety scales. Regardless of methods applied, investigators should use a combination of statistical significance, magnitude of the DIF effect and investigator judgement when interpreting the results.
机译:当在HADS抑郁症和HADS焦虑量表中识别DIF时,序数逻辑回归,Rasch分析和列联表方法产生了一致的结果。无论采用哪种方法,研究人员在解释结果时应综合考虑统计学意义,DIF效应的大小和研究人员的判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号