首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry
【24h】

In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry

机译:寻找系统创新以促进可持续发展:十年的社会学习探究中出现的设计实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Processes of designing for systemic innovation for sustainable development (SD) through the lens of three long-term case studies are reported. All case studies, which originated from the SLIM (Social Learning for the Integrated Management and Sustainable Use of Water at Catchment Scale) Project, funded within the EU Fifth Framework Program (2001 -2004), constitute inquiry pathways that are explored using a critical incident approach. The initial starting conditions for each inquiry pathway are compared; significant pathway dependencies are identified which foster the development of social learning processes locally, but constrain their uptake and embedding across the wider system of interest. In the first case study, in England & Wales, promising developments in the application of social learning approaches to river basin planning over an initial 3-year period were subsequently marginalised, only to resurface towards the end of the 10-year period of study. In the second, South African case study, significant spaces for social learning and innovation in integrated water resources management were opened up over a five year period but closed down again, primarily as the result of lack of policy support by national government. The third, Italian, case study was designed to assess options for adapting to climate change by opening up new learning spaces between researchers, stakeholders and policy makers. A case for investing in local level systemic innovation through social-learning praxis design approaches and in learning processes around well contextualised case-studies is supported. However, concomitant investment by policy makers in social learning as an alternative, but complementary, governance mechanism for systemic innovation for SD is needed.
机译:通过三个长期的案例研究,报告了为可持续发展进行系统创新的设计过程。所有案例研究均源于欧盟第五框架计划(2001 -2004)资助的SLIM(集水规模的水资源综合管理和可持续利用的社会学习)项目,构成了使用严重事件进行探索的探究路径。方法。比较每个查询路径的初始启动条件;确定了重要的途径依赖关系,这些依赖关系促进了本地社会学习过程的发展,但限制了他们对更广泛的兴趣系统的接受和嵌入。在第一个案例研究中,在英格兰和威尔士,社会学习方法在流域规划最初3年的应用中有希望的发展随后被边缘化,直到10年研究期末才重新出现。在第二个南非案例研究中,五年来开放了水资源综合管理中的社会学习和创新的重要空间,但由于国家政府缺乏政策支持,该空间再次关闭。第三个意大利案例研究旨在通过在研究人员,利益相关者和政策制定者之间开放新的学习空间来评估适应气候变化的方案。支持通过社会学习实践设计方法在地方层面的系统创新上进行投资的案例,以及在围绕上下文相关案例研究的学习过程中进行投资的案例。但是,政策制定者需要在社会学习上进行相应的投资,以作为可持续发展的系统创新的替代但互补的治理机制。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2014年第4期|760-771|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Applied Systems Thinking in Practice Group, Engineering & Innovation Department, The Open University, UK,Letsema Circle Trust, East London, South Africa;

    Applied Systems Thinking in Practice Group, Engineering & Innovation Department, The Open University, UK;

    Letsema Circle Trust, East London, South Africa;

    Applied Systems Thinking in Practice Group, Engineering & Innovation Department, The Open University, UK;

    School of Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa;

    Cinnabar, Johannesburg, South Africa;

    Applied Systems Thinking in Practice Group, Engineering & Innovation Department, The Open University, UK,Monash Sustainability Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia;

    Nucleo di Ricerca sulla Desertificazione and Dipartimento di Agraria, Universita degli studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy;

    Nucleo di Ricerca sulla Desertificazione and Dipartimento di Agraria, Universita degli studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Design; Framing; Governance; Social learning; Sustainable development; Systemic innovation;

    机译:设计;构图;治理;社会学习;可持续发展;系统创新;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号