首页> 外文期刊>The Leadership quarterly >The relative importance of participative versus decisive behavior in predicting stakeholders' perceptions of leader effectiveness
【24h】

The relative importance of participative versus decisive behavior in predicting stakeholders' perceptions of leader effectiveness

机译:参与与决定性的相对重要性在预测利益相关者对领导者有效性的看法中的相对重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Today's leaders are often faced with resolving paradoxes stemming from interrelated, yet contradictory demands. One example is the tension between participation and decision speed because, despite its advantages, stakeholder involvement often slows the decision-making process. Theory and research suggest that a "both-and" approach in which leaders simultaneously harmonize competing demands is associated with effectiveness. Consistent with this reasoning, we hypothesized that leaders rated higher in both participative and decisive behavior are perceived as most effective. Additionally, however, we hypothesized that stakeholders place different importance on these behaviors, with direct reports emphasizing participation and supervisors emphasizing decisiveness. Using a large 360-degree feedback dataset, several analyses conducted both within and between stakeholder groups supported these predictions. These results add needed nuance to the leadership literature, suggesting that a "both-and" approach may paradoxically result in some behaviors that are less predictive of effectiveness for certain stakeholders.
机译:今天的领导者往往面临着源于相互关联的悖论的解决方案。一个例子是参与和决策速度之间的紧张因素,因为尽管有其优势,利益相关者参与往往会减慢决策过程。理论与研究表明,领导者同时协调竞争需求的“双方和”方法与有效性相关。与此推理一致,我们假设参与和决定性行为的领导者更高,被认为是最有效的。此外,我们假设利益相关者对这些行为的不同重视,直接报告强调参与和监督强调毁容。使用大型360度的反馈数据集,利益相关者组内和利益相关者组之间进行了几种分析支持这些预测。这些结果为领导文献添加了所需的细微差别,表明“双方和”方法可以矛盾地导致某些行为,这些行为对某些利益相关者的有效性不那么难以。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号