...
首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation review >Stakeholder Involvement in Evaluation: Does it Affect Observers' Perceptions of an Evaluation? And Which Stakeholder Group(s) Do People Think Should to Participate?
【24h】

Stakeholder Involvement in Evaluation: Does it Affect Observers' Perceptions of an Evaluation? And Which Stakeholder Group(s) Do People Think Should to Participate?

机译:利益相关者参与评估:它是否会影响观察者对评估的看法? 人们应该参加哪些利益相关者群体?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Stakeholders are often involved in evaluation, such as in the selection of specific research questions and the interpretation of results. Except for the topic of whether stakeholder involvement increases use, a paucity of research exists to guide practice regarding stakeholders. Objectives: We address two questions: (1) If a third-party observer knows stakeholders were involved in an evaluation, does that affect the perceived credibility, fairness, and relevance of the evaluation? (2) Among individuals with a possible stake in an evaluation, which stakeholder group(s) do they want to see participate; in particular, do they prefer that multiple stakeholder groups, rather than a single group, participate? Research Design: Six studies are reported. All studies address the former question, while Studies 3 to 5 also focus on the latter question. To study effects of stakeholder involvement on third-party views, participants read summaries of ostensible evaluations, with stakeholder involvement noted or not. To examine a priori preferences among potential stakeholders, participants completed a survey about alternative stakeholder group involvement in an evaluation in which they would likely have an interest. Results and Conclusions: Across studies, effects of reported stakeholder participation on third-parties' views were not robust; however, small effects on perceived fairness sometimes, but not always, occurred after stakeholder involvement and its rationales had been made salient. All surveys showed a large preference for the involvement of multiple, rather than single stakeholder groups. We discuss implications for research and practice regarding stakeholder involvement, and for research on evaluation more generally.
机译:背景:利益相关者经常参与评估,例如在选择特定的研究问题和结果的解释中。除了利益相关者参与是否增加使用的话题,存在对利益攸关方的实践存在的缺乏研究。目标:我们解决了两个问题:(1)如果第三方观察者知道利益相关者参与评估,那么这会影响评估的感知信誉,公平性和相关性吗? (2)在评估可能股权的个人中,他们希望看到参与哪些利益相关者组;特别是,他们更喜欢多个利益相关者群体,而不是单一的群体参加?研究设计:报告了六项研究。所有研究都解决了前一个问题,而研究3至5也关注后者的问题。为了研究利益相关者参与第三方观点的影响,参与者阅读了方面的评估摘要,利益攸关方参与或不参与。为了在潜在利益相关者之间审查先验的偏好,参与者完成了关于替代利益相关者群体的调查,参与他们可能有利息的评估。结果与结论:跨研究,报告的利益攸关方参与第三方观点的影响并不强大;然而,在利益相关者参与之后,有时候对感知公平的小效果有时候发生,并且其理由已经突出。所有调查显示对多个而不是单一利益相关者群体的参与表现出大的偏好。我们讨论对利益相关者参与的研究和实践的影响,并更普遍研究评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号