首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development >Framing interculturality: a corpus-based analysis of online promotional discourse of higher education intercultural communication courses
【24h】

Framing interculturality: a corpus-based analysis of online promotional discourse of higher education intercultural communication courses

机译:构筑跨文化性:高等教育跨文化交流课程在线促销话语的语料库分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines how intercultural communication (ICC) and the notion of culture are framed in on-line promotional discourse of higher education (HE) ICC courses. It analyses a specialised corpus comprised of 14,842 words from 43 course websites of master's programmes in ICC in the UK and the US - internationally, the two largest providers of such programmes. Through combining corpus tools with a situated meaning' approach, the analysis reveals that while a small number of courses acknowledge cultural complexity', culture is still very often reduced to an essentialised and static notion, despite growing criticism against such an approach in ICC literature. ICC is valorised as a combination of desirable skills and knowledge conducive to effective communication of different cultural groups and for those working in international arenas. Significant differences between the UK and US courses are identified with regard to the extent of associations with diversity-related social categories. The lack of interpretive, critical, and constructivist positions on culture in promotional discourse is discussed in the context of neoliberal discourse and the current thinking towards professional competences dominant in Britain, North America, and other parts of the world.
机译:本文研究了如何在高等教育ICC课程的在线宣传中构建跨文化交流(ICC)和文化概念。它分析了来自英国和美国ICC硕士学位课程的43个课程网站上的专业语料库,该语料库由14,842个单词组成-在国际上,这是此类课程的两个最大提供者。通过将语料库工具与处境意义的方法相结合,分析表明,尽管少数课程承认文化的复杂性,但尽管在ICC文献中对这种方法的批评越来越多,但文化仍然经常被简化为本质化和静态的概念。 ICC具有良好的技能和知识相结合的优势,有助于不同文化群体以及在国际舞台上工作的人们进行有效的沟通。在与多样性相关的社会类别的关联程度方面,英国和美国课程之间存在显着差异。在新自由主义话语的背景下,讨论了在促销话语中缺乏对文化的解释,批判和建构主义立场的情况,以及当前对在英国,北美和世界其他地区占主导地位的专业能力的思考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号