首页> 外文期刊>无_Journal of Management & Organization >Agent and stewardship behavior: How do they differ?
【24h】

Agent and stewardship behavior: How do they differ?

机译:代理和管理行为:它们有何不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study is examine how agency theory and stewardship theory lead to different firm-level outcomes on an array of different outcomes. Based on these differences, we argue for the development of an agent-steward measurement scale, which will help researchers classify chief executive officers (CEOs) along an agent-steward continuum. This, in turn, will spur research to predict and test CEO behaviors and firm-level outcomes. Agency theory suggests CEOs take advantage of their powerful positions to maximize their personal economic utility, whereas stewardship theory suggests CEOs are motivated through intrinsic awards and will balance their interests with those of other stakeholders. We use these theories to examine possible differences in CEO behaviors. This is important because different CEO behaviors might lead to differing impacts on important firm-level outcomes. This paper reviews the relevant agency and stewardship literatures, then offers propositions regarding CEO behaviors from agent and steward perspectives.
机译:本研究的目的是检验代理理论和管理理论如何在一系列不同的结果上导致不同的公司级结果。基于这些差异,我们主张开发一个代理-管家测量量表,这将有助于研究人员根据代理-管家的连续性对首席执行官进行分类。反过来,这将刺激研究,以预测和测试首席执行官的行为和公司层面的成果。代理理论表明,首席执行官利用其强大的职位来最大限度地发挥其个人经济效用,而管理理论则表明,首席执行官受到内在奖励的激励,并将平衡他们与其他利益相关者的利益。我们使用这些理论来检验CEO行为中可能存在的差异。这很重要,因为不同的CEO行为可能导致对重要的公司级成果的不同影响。本文回顾了有关代理和管理的文献,然后从代理和管理者的角度提出了有关CEO行为的命题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号