首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Literacy Research >The Effects of Three Instructional Methods on the Reading Comprehension and Content Acquisition of Novice Readers
【24h】

The Effects of Three Instructional Methods on the Reading Comprehension and Content Acquisition of Novice Readers

机译:三种教学方法对新手阅读理解和内容获取的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study explores the effects of 3 instructional methods: Picture Walks (Clay, 1991; Fountas & Pinnell, 1996), KWL (Ogle, 1986), and the Directed Reading-Thinking Activity (Stauffer, 1969) on the reading comprehension and science content acquisition of novice readers. The participants were 31 second-graders with an instructional reading level that was approaching grade level. A replicated Latin Square, within-subjects repeated measures design was employed that examined 4 treatments: 3 intervention groups (PW, KWL, DRTA) and a control group. The primary analysis evaluated treatment effects by conducting one-way repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) on all measures, using the group as the unit of analysis. Results indicated that the picture walk and DRTA yielded statistically significant effects on reading growth as measured by a timed maze task. Analysis of Cued Recall indicated that the DRTA yielded statistically significant effects in reading comprehension and science content acquisition. KWL did not yield significant effects on measures of comprehension or content acquisition. Student interviews provided evidence that the participants possessed declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge of the strategic processes that are the foundation for the 3 interventions, activation of prior knowledge, and prediction. However, the likelihood of the participants putting that knowledge to effective use seemed to be dependent upon the amount of teacher scaffolding provided by the instructional procedure.
机译:这项研究探索了3种教学方法的影响:Picture Walks(Clay,1991; Fountas&Pinnell,1996),KWL(Ogle,1986),以及定向阅读思维活动(Stauffer,1969)对阅读理解和科学内容的影响。获得新手读者。参与者是31个二年级学生,其阅读水平已经接近年级水平。采用重复的拉丁方,受试者内部重复测量设计,该设计检查了4种治​​疗:3个干预组(PW,KWL,DRTA)和对照组。初步分析以组为分析单位,通过对所有测量进行单向重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)来评估治疗效果。结果表明,通过定时迷宫任务测量,图片走动和DRTA对阅读增长产生了统计学上显着的影响。 Cued Recall的分析表明,DRTA在阅读理解和科学内容获取方面产生了统计学上显着的影响。 KWL对理解或内容获取的度量没有显着影响。学生访谈提供了证据,表明参与者对战略过程具有声明性,程序性和条件性知识,这是这三种干预措施,激活先验知识和预测的基础。但是,参与者有效利用该知识的可能性似乎取决于教学程序提供的教师支架的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号