首页> 外文期刊>Reading and Writing >A randomized experiment of a mixed-methods literacy intervention for struggling readers in grades 4–6: effects on word reading efficiency, reading comprehension and vocabulary, and oral reading fluency
【24h】

A randomized experiment of a mixed-methods literacy intervention for struggling readers in grades 4–6: effects on word reading efficiency, reading comprehension and vocabulary, and oral reading fluency

机译:一项针对4-6年级挣扎的读者的混合方法读写干预的随机实验:对单词阅读效率,阅读理解和词汇以及口语阅读流利度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was (1) to examine the causal effects of READ 180, a mixed-methods literacy intervention, on measures of word reading efficiency, reading comprehension and vocabulary, and oral reading fluency and (2) to examine whether print exposure among children in the experimental condition explained variance in posttest reading scores. A total of 294 children in Grades 4–6 were randomly assigned to READ 180 or a district after-school program. Both programs were implemented 4 days per week over 23 weeks. Children in the READ 180 intervention participated in three 20-min literacy activities, including (1) individualized computer-assisted reading instruction with videos, leveled text, and word study activities, (2) independent and modeled reading practice with leveled books, and (3) teacher-directed reading lessons tailored to the reading level of children in small groups. Children in the district after-school program participated in a 60-min program in which teachers were able to select from 16 different enrichment activities that were designed to improve student attendance. There was no significant difference between children in READ 180 and the district after-school program on norm-referenced measures of word reading efficiency, reading comprehension, and vocabulary. Although READ 180 had a positive impact on oral reading fluency and attendance, these effects were restricted to children in Grade 4. Print exposure, as measured by the number of words children read on the READ 180 computer lessons, explained 4% of the variance in vocabulary and 2% of the variance in word reading efficiency after all pretest reading scores were partialed out.
机译:这项研究的目的是(1)研究READ 180(一种混合方法读写干预)对单词阅读效率,阅读理解和词汇以及口语阅读流畅度的因果影响,以及(2)检查是否有印刷品暴露在实验条件下的儿童​​中,解释了测验后阅读成绩的差异。总共有294名4-6年级的孩子被随机分配到READ 180或一个地区的课后计划。两项计划在23周内每周执行4天。 READ 180干预中的孩子参加了三项20分钟的识字活动,包括(1)带有视频,水平文本和单词学习活动的个性化计算机辅助阅读指导,(2)具有水平书的独立和模拟阅读练习,以及( 3)针对小班儿童阅读水平量身定制的教师指导阅读课。该地区课后计划的孩子们参加了一个60分钟的计划,在该计划中,老师们可以从旨在提高学生出勤率的16种不同的丰富活动中进行选择。 READ 180的孩子与学区的课后计划在单词参照效率,阅读理解力和词汇量的规范参考测量方面没有显着差异。尽管READ 180对口语阅读流利度和出勤率有积极影响,但这些影响仅限于4年级的儿童。打印暴露量(通过READ 180计算机课上儿童阅读的单词数来衡量)解释了4%的差异。所有预测试的阅读成绩后,词汇量和单词阅读效率方差的2%均被剔除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号