首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Money and Finance >Too big to fail: Some empirical evidence on the causes and consequences of public banking interventions in the UK
【24h】

Too big to fail: Some empirical evidence on the causes and consequences of public banking interventions in the UK

机译:太大而不能倒:关于英国公共银行干预的成因和后果的一些经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

During the 2007-09 financial crisis, the banking sector received an extraordinary level of public support. In this empirical paper, we examine the determinants of a number of public sector interventions: government funding or central bank liquidity insurance schemes, public capital injections, and nationalizations. We use bank-level data spanning all British and foreign banks operating within the United Kingdom. We use multinomial logit regression techniques and find that a bank's size, relative to the size of the entire banking system, typically has a large positive and non-linear effect on the probability of public sector intervention for a bank. We also use instrumental variable techniques to show that British interventions helped; there is fragile evidence that the wholesale (non-core) funding of an affected institution increased significantly following capital injection or nationalization.
机译:在2007-09年金融危机期间,银行业获得了非同寻常的公众支持。在这篇经验论文中,我们研究了许多公共部门干预的决定因素:政府资助或中央银行流动性保险计划,公共资本注入和国有化。我们使用的银行级别数据涵盖了在英国境内运营的所有英国和外国银行。我们使用多项式logit回归技术,发现相对于整个银行系统的规模,银行的规模通常会对银行的公共部门干预概率产生较大的正非线性影响。我们还使用工具变量技术来证明英国的干预有所帮助。有脆弱的证据表明,在注资或国有化之后,受影响机构的批发(非核心)资金大量增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号