...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advertising research >Pitting the Mall Against the Internet In Advertising-Research Completion Internet Panels Are More Popular. Are They More Effective?
【24h】

Pitting the Mall Against the Internet In Advertising-Research Completion Internet Panels Are More Popular. Are They More Effective?

机译:在广告研究中将商场与互联网抗衡互联网面板更受欢迎。他们更有效吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Internet surveys-particularly those utilizing panels of consumers-have supplanted the mall intercept as the method of choice for many advertising researchers. Internet surveys are estimated to be growing at a rate of almost 14 percent per year, with as much as 35 percent of all advertising research conducted using Internet panels. One question remains: How do the data utilizing Internet panels compare with mall-intercept data? This empirical study seeks to answer this question by replicating four mall-intercept studies using an Internet panel. Print, broadcast, and Internet ads were tested using the same products/brands, test and control ads, screening criteria, and survey questions. The results showed some differences, particularly with responses to open-end questions. The results also demonstrated that much of that difference appeared to be due to the influence of the researcher in the mall-intercept environment, a factor not present with Internet-panel surveys.
机译:互联网调查,尤其是那些利用消费者调查的调查,已经取代了商场拦截作为许多广告研究人员的选择方法。据估计,互联网调查以每年近14%的速度增长,其中多达35%的广告研究是使用互联网面板进行的。仍然存在一个问题:利用Internet面板的数据与购物中心拦截数据如何比较?本实证研究试图通过使用互联网专家组复制四项购物中心拦截研究来回答这个问题。印刷,广播和互联网广告使用相同的产品/品牌,测试和对照广告,筛选标准以及调查问题进行了测试。结果显示出一些差异,特别是对开放式问题的回答。结果还表明,大部分差异似乎是由于研究人员在购物中心拦截环境中的影响所致,而这是互联网面板调查中没有的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号