首页> 外文期刊>Interactive Learning Environments >Interactive highlighting for just-in-time formative assessment during whole-class instruction: effects on vocabulary learning and reading comprehension
【24h】

Interactive highlighting for just-in-time formative assessment during whole-class instruction: effects on vocabulary learning and reading comprehension

机译:互动式高亮显示,用于全班教学中的即时形成性评估:对词汇学习和阅读理解的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the effectiveness of a software that supports formative assessment in real-time of learners' vocabulary knowledge through an interactive highlighting method. Students in a classroom are given a passage on their computer screen and asked to highlight the words they do not understand. This information is summarized on the instructors screen by highlighting in red the words most highlighted, in orange the second most highlighted, and in yellow the third most highlighted, with a superscript showing the number of students who selected each word. The instructor projects this summary on a screen for the whole class and use it to guide activities on how to comprehend the passage. In Experiment 1, college students who learned with interactive highlighting in a single-session study scored higher on a vocabulary test (d = 1.14) but not on a comprehension test as compared to a control group that studied the same passage without interactive highlighting. In Experiment 2, high school students who learned with interactive highlighting across a 10-week program scored higher on a standardized reading comprehension test as compared to a control group that studied without interactive highlighting (d = 1.60 in school 1, d = 1.17 in school 2).
机译:本文探讨了一种软件的有效性,该软件通过交互式突出显示方法实时支持学习者词汇知识的形成性评估。教室中的学生会在计算机屏幕上看到一段文字,并要求他们突出他们不懂的单词。在教员屏幕上,通过以红色突出显示最突出显示的单词,以橙色突出显示第二个突出显示的内容,以黄色突出显示第三个突出显示的内容,并以黄色突出显示选择每个单词的学生人数,来概括此信息。讲师将此摘要投影到整个班级的屏幕上,并用它来指导有关如何理解段落的活动。在实验1中,与在无互动突出显示的情况下研究相同段落的对照组相比,在单节研究中通过互动突出显示学习的大学生在词汇测试中得分更高(d = 1.14),但在综合测试中却没有更高。在实验2中,在10周课程中通过互动式突出显示学习的高中学生,在标准阅读理解测试中的得分高于未进行互动式突出显示的对照组(学校1中d = 1.60,学校中d = 1.17) 2)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号